Categories

Investing Observation & Opinion

Tools

  • Economy & Politics
  • Investing
  • Personal Finance
  • Related Posts


    Planar Systems Is The Oversold Pick Of The Week
    Warren Buffett Successors Revealed: Meet Ajit Jain And Greg Abel
    Don’t Give Up 260% Gains Because Of This “Market-High” Myth
    Tesla Motors Stock Price: Volatile, But A Long-Term Win
    Ebola-infected Nurse Contends Dallas Hospital Violated Her Privacy
    2000 Vs. 2015: Market’s Vital Signs Healthier Today
    Seven Tech Funds Are Still Down 50% Since Nasdaq 5000
    The 13 Stocks That Beat Warren Buffett!
    As Currency War Erupts, Buy American
    Barclays Is Like the JPMorgan of England – Profits and Legal Fees
    Hollywood Should Be Very Afraid Of Popcorn Time, The “Netflix For Piracy”
    Best Buy Profit Beats Estimates On Higher-margin TV Sales
    Fiat Chrysler U.S. February Sales Dampen Expectations For Industry
    Futures Dip After Dow, S&P Records And Nasdaq 5,000
    Citi To Sell OneMain To Springleaf For $4.25 Billion


    174 ETFs You Should Never Buy

    My apologies, but I misspoke last week.

    The most dangerous, wealth-destroying investment in the world right now isn’t cash. It’s leveraged exchange-traded funds (ETFs).

    By my count, there are at least 174 of these in existence. And on the surface, these ETFs promise to double or triple the movements of the underlying markets they track.

    I’m here to tell you that they’ll do anything but.

    You see, double- and triple-leveraged ETFs (whether long or short) pack a nasty surprise. It’s almost unbelievable, actually.

    And particularly in this volatile market, theses ETFs are hardwired for losses.

    Here’s what I mean.

    The Nuts And Bolts Of Leveraged ETFs

    Leveraged ETFs have been around only since 2006.

    Given such newness, let’s first make sure we’re all on the same page regarding the general mechanics of how they work.

    A normal ETF is constructed to mirror the movement of an underlying index. If the index rises 5 percent, the ETF that’s tracking it is supposed to rise 5 percent (before expenses). And an inverse ETF simply moves in the opposite direction of the index that it’s tracking. So if the index drops 5 percent, the inverse ETF should rise 5 percent.

    When you apply leverage, however, these movements are magnified. So if the inverse ETF uses three-times leverage and the index falls 5 percent, the ETF should rise 15 percent.

    Sounds simple enough in theory, right?

    Too bad the reality doesn’t measure up. Or, as Yogi Berra used to say, “In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. But in practice, there is.”

    Leverage? What Leverage?

    Consider this: From January to May 15, 2009, the Russell 1000 Financial Services Index fell by 5.9 percent.

    So a long ETF using three-times leverage should have dropped by 17.7 percent (-5.9 x 3 = -17.7 percent). Instead, it plummeted by 65.6 percent.

    And an inverse ETF using three-times leverage should have been up 17.7 percent. But it sank by 83.4 percent.

    Talk about not getting what you paid for.

    Pick any other period, and I promise it will yield similarly confounding results. And the worst offenders will always be the ETFs using three-times leverage.

    The question is: Why?

    Two Fatal Flaws of Leveraged ETFs

    Just so we’re clear, I don’t detest all ETFs.

    Regular ETFs provide a low-cost way to achieve instant diversification and access markets that aren’t readily available. And unlike traditional mutual funds, they provide intraday liquidity.

    But when it comes to leveraged ETFs, those benefits are completely nullified by two fatal flaws.

    Fatal Flaw No. 1: Daily Rebalancing

    Leveraged ETFs don’t actually buy individual stocks. Instead, they invest in derivatives. And these derivatives require daily rebalancing in order to match the rise or fall in the index. Otherwise, the leverage ratio for the ETF will be off-kilter. That means leveraged ETFs can only be counted on to perform (as promised) for a single day.

    In other words, they’re for day traders only — not investors.

    But this distinction isn’t being communicated clearly to investors. As a result, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission actually felt the need to issue its own warning about the confusion surrounding leveraged ETFs.

    Fatal Flaw No. 2: The ‘Dark Magic’ Of Compounding

    For years, we’ve been wooed by the magic of compounding returns. If you’re 18 years old and invest $2,000 per year for three years (and not a penny more after that), they say you’ll end up a millionaire if you simply leave it invested and let compounding work its magic.

    But when it comes to leveraged ETFs, compounding often works against us.

    For example, consider what would happen if a regular ETF drops by 10 percent one day, then rises by 10 percent the next. (And for simplicity’s sake, let’s assume the starting value of the index it tracks is 100.)

    • Day 1: The ETF would be down 10 percent to $90.
    • Day 2: It would rise by 10 percent to reach an ending value of $99.

    Total Return: -1 percent

    Now let’s take a look at what happens with an ETF that seeks double the return of the index (i.e., uses two-times leverage). Again, we’ll assume a starting value of $100.

    • Day 1: The ETF would be down 20 percent to $80.
    • Day 2: It would rise by 20 percent to reach an ending value of $96.

    Total Return: -4 percent (when it should actually be down only 2 percent)

    If we ratchet up the leverage to three-times and extend the holding period, it magnifies the negative impact of compounding. Toss in some market volatility, which we’re experiencing now, and this tracking error gets even worse.

    Bottom line: Beneath a simple exterior and the allure of a novel hedging strategy, there are considerable complexities and risks associated with leveraged ETFs.

    Unless you’re a day trader with an uncanny ability to predict every jot and tittle of the market, avoid leveraged ETFs like the plague. Heck, even if you could pull off such a feat, the transaction costs would eat your portfolio alive.

    So the best bet is to simply avoid leveraged ETFs altogether.

    Ahead of the tape,

    — Louis Basenese

    Louis Basenese Co-Founder, Chief Investment Strategist for Wall Street Daily. A former Wall Street consultant and analyst, Louis helped direct over $1 billion in institutional capital before founding Wall Street Daily where he serves as Chief Investment Strategist. In addition to being an expert on technology and small-cap stocks, Louis is also well versed in special situations, including Mergers & Acquisitions and spinoffs.

    | All posts from Louis Basenese

    Discuss this Story:

    Comment Policy: We encourage open discussion. Comments including racist statements, profanity, name calling or spam will be removed at our discretion. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear it is likely because it violates the policy.

    Oil Rebounds Toward $62 As Rival Libyan Forces Trade Air Strikes
    Strong German Retail Sales Keep European Shares Near Seven-year Highs
    Barclays Gives Information To U.S. Precious Metals Probe
    Barclays Takes $1.2 Billion Charge As FX Settlement Looms
    Venmo’s Response To Questions About Security: Not Much
    Morse Code Vs. Typewriter: Which Angry Verizon Net Neutrality Rant Wins?
    Meet Silvercar, The Startup Trying To Shake Up Airport Car Rental
    Macy’s Is Making Its Own Version Of T.J. Maxx And Nordstrom Rack
    The Hotel Industry’s Race To Escape The Dinosaur Age
    It’s Never A Stock Picker’s Market
    Crude Carnage Continues Amid Saudi Production & Storage Limits
    The Best And Worst Performing Assets In February And YTD
    Debt-To-GDP Ratios Demand Debt Jubilee
    More Flash Crashes To Come As Shadow Banking Liquidity Collapses
    How To Identify The Best Small-Cap Stocks
    How To Buy Bitcoin From A Bitcoin ATM
    Warning: High-Risk “Junk” Bond Squeeze Headed For Oil Market
    HP To Acquire Aruba Networks For $3B
    Markets Brace For March Madness
    Why Nasdaq 5000 Matters To You
    The 8 Most Expensive Stocks You Can Buy
    Two Hedge Fund Managers Walk Into A Bar…
    Stocks Have Best Month Since October 2011
    Berkshire Insurance ‘Superstar’ Could Fill Buffett’s Shoes
    Futures Flat After Strong February; Data On Tap
    Oil Falls Toward $61 On Dollar, Supply Concerns
    Apple, Google Workers Head To Court On $415 Million Poaching Settlement
    NXP To Buy Freescale, Create $40 Billion Company
    Europe Shares Hold At Seven-year Highs, China Rate Cut Lifts Asia
    SEC Plans To Level Playing Field For Newer ETF Firms
    Read more from Investing...

    Liberty Investor Digest

    Get today's most important
    financial headlines all in
    one place by email!



    Sources


    close[X]

    Sign Up For Liberty Investor Digest™!

    Get Liberty Investor Digest FREE By Email!

    Input your name and email address in the fields below and get today's most important financial headlines sent straight to you inbox!

    Privacy PolicyYou can opt-out at any time. We protect your information like a mother hen. We will not sell or rent your email address to anyone for any reason.