Categories

Investing Observation & Opinion

Tools

  • Economy & Politics
  • Investing
  • Personal Finance
  • Related Posts


    Tax Inversion Deals: Washington Blames Wall Street For Its Mess
    Where Have The Bulls Gone?
    Is This The Chart That Has High-Yield Investors Running For The Hills?
    China Regulator In Anti-monopoly Probe Of Microsoft
    Focus Turns To U.S. Outlook, Russian Stocks Stabilize
    McDonald’s Japan Withdraws Profit Guidance After China Food Scare
    BP Profit Jumps But Warns Of Russia Sanctions Impact
    Goldman Unit Eyes Foray Into China Amid Metals Financing Scandal
    Panasonic To Initially Invest $200-300 Million In Tesla Battery Plant
    Darden CEO Steps Down Amid Food Fight With Investors
    Herbalife Ltd. Shares Tumble After Hours On Weak Earnings Report
    Modi’s New India Is Off To A Bad Start
    Lloyds Got Creative To Manipulate Libor
    Is Gold Ready For China And Bitcoin?
    Dollar Tree To Buy Family Dollar For $8.5 Billion


    174 ETFs You Should Never Buy

    My apologies, but I misspoke last week.

    The most dangerous, wealth-destroying investment in the world right now isn’t cash. It’s leveraged exchange-traded funds (ETFs).

    By my count, there are at least 174 of these in existence. And on the surface, these ETFs promise to double or triple the movements of the underlying markets they track.

    I’m here to tell you that they’ll do anything but.

    You see, double- and triple-leveraged ETFs (whether long or short) pack a nasty surprise. It’s almost unbelievable, actually.

    And particularly in this volatile market, theses ETFs are hardwired for losses.

    Here’s what I mean.

    The Nuts And Bolts Of Leveraged ETFs

    Leveraged ETFs have been around only since 2006.

    Given such newness, let’s first make sure we’re all on the same page regarding the general mechanics of how they work.

    A normal ETF is constructed to mirror the movement of an underlying index. If the index rises 5 percent, the ETF that’s tracking it is supposed to rise 5 percent (before expenses). And an inverse ETF simply moves in the opposite direction of the index that it’s tracking. So if the index drops 5 percent, the inverse ETF should rise 5 percent.

    When you apply leverage, however, these movements are magnified. So if the inverse ETF uses three-times leverage and the index falls 5 percent, the ETF should rise 15 percent.

    Sounds simple enough in theory, right?

    Too bad the reality doesn’t measure up. Or, as Yogi Berra used to say, “In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. But in practice, there is.”

    Leverage? What Leverage?

    Consider this: From January to May 15, 2009, the Russell 1000 Financial Services Index fell by 5.9 percent.

    So a long ETF using three-times leverage should have dropped by 17.7 percent (-5.9 x 3 = -17.7 percent). Instead, it plummeted by 65.6 percent.

    And an inverse ETF using three-times leverage should have been up 17.7 percent. But it sank by 83.4 percent.

    Talk about not getting what you paid for.

    Pick any other period, and I promise it will yield similarly confounding results. And the worst offenders will always be the ETFs using three-times leverage.

    The question is: Why?

    Two Fatal Flaws of Leveraged ETFs

    Just so we’re clear, I don’t detest all ETFs.

    Regular ETFs provide a low-cost way to achieve instant diversification and access markets that aren’t readily available. And unlike traditional mutual funds, they provide intraday liquidity.

    But when it comes to leveraged ETFs, those benefits are completely nullified by two fatal flaws.

    Fatal Flaw No. 1: Daily Rebalancing

    Leveraged ETFs don’t actually buy individual stocks. Instead, they invest in derivatives. And these derivatives require daily rebalancing in order to match the rise or fall in the index. Otherwise, the leverage ratio for the ETF will be off-kilter. That means leveraged ETFs can only be counted on to perform (as promised) for a single day.

    In other words, they’re for day traders only — not investors.

    But this distinction isn’t being communicated clearly to investors. As a result, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission actually felt the need to issue its own warning about the confusion surrounding leveraged ETFs.

    Fatal Flaw No. 2: The ‘Dark Magic’ Of Compounding

    For years, we’ve been wooed by the magic of compounding returns. If you’re 18 years old and invest $2,000 per year for three years (and not a penny more after that), they say you’ll end up a millionaire if you simply leave it invested and let compounding work its magic.

    But when it comes to leveraged ETFs, compounding often works against us.

    For example, consider what would happen if a regular ETF drops by 10 percent one day, then rises by 10 percent the next. (And for simplicity’s sake, let’s assume the starting value of the index it tracks is 100.)

    • Day 1: The ETF would be down 10 percent to $90.
    • Day 2: It would rise by 10 percent to reach an ending value of $99.

    Total Return: -1 percent

    Now let’s take a look at what happens with an ETF that seeks double the return of the index (i.e., uses two-times leverage). Again, we’ll assume a starting value of $100.

    • Day 1: The ETF would be down 20 percent to $80.
    • Day 2: It would rise by 20 percent to reach an ending value of $96.

    Total Return: -4 percent (when it should actually be down only 2 percent)

    If we ratchet up the leverage to three-times and extend the holding period, it magnifies the negative impact of compounding. Toss in some market volatility, which we’re experiencing now, and this tracking error gets even worse.

    Bottom line: Beneath a simple exterior and the allure of a novel hedging strategy, there are considerable complexities and risks associated with leveraged ETFs.

    Unless you’re a day trader with an uncanny ability to predict every jot and tittle of the market, avoid leveraged ETFs like the plague. Heck, even if you could pull off such a feat, the transaction costs would eat your portfolio alive.

    So the best bet is to simply avoid leveraged ETFs altogether.

    Ahead of the tape,

    — Louis Basenese

    Louis Basenese Co-Founder, Chief Investment Strategist for Wall Street Daily. A former Wall Street consultant and analyst, Louis helped direct over $1 billion in institutional capital before founding Wall Street Daily where he serves as Chief Investment Strategist. In addition to being an expert on technology and small-cap stocks, Louis is also well versed in special situations, including Mergers & Acquisitions and spinoffs.

    | All posts from Louis Basenese

    Discuss this Story:

    Comment Policy: We encourage open discussion. Comments including racist statements, profanity, name calling or spam will be removed at our discretion. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear it is likely because it violates the policy.

    Trendy Chipotle Burritos Show How Pricing Power Belongs To The Hip
    “Reprehensible” Lloyds Bank Agrees To $105 Million Wristslap For Manipulating Libor
    Near-Record Trulia Shorts Crushed After Zillow Acquires Incomeless Company For $3.5 Billion
    US Equities Flat While China Surges On More Stimulus And Bailout Hopes
    Like Dripping Silver Icicles
    ‘London Fix’ Gold Rigging By Bullion Bank Exposed In Class Action Lawsuit: The Complete Charts
    It Is Mostly About The US Next Week
    If You Want To Be Rich And Powerful, Majoring In STEM Is A Good Place To Start
    The Threat Of Rising Rates
    Europe Nervy As Russian Assets Hit By New Sanctions Talk
    Tyson To Sell Mexican, Brazilian Poultry Businesses To JBS
    Hague Court Orders Russia To Pay Over $50 Billion In Yukos Case
    Futures Flat With S&P 500 Near Record Levels
    Microsoft Says Government Officials Make Sudden Visits To China Offices
    Pfizer’s Need For Deal Looms Larger With Earnings Report
    China Condemns U.S. Anti-dumping Duties On Solar Imports
    JD.com To Sell Microsoft’s Xbox One Games Console In China
    Scandal-hit China Food Firm Withdrawing All Products, U.S. Parent Says
    Russia To Ban Several McDonalds Burgers Including Royal And Filet-O-Fish
    Starbucks Sales In Americas Region Up Slightly More Than Expected
    Futures Dragged Down By Visa, Amazon Despite USDJPY Levitation
    CEO Of Russia’s 2nd Largest Gold Producer Is ‘Horrified’ At Market Manipulation
    Creation Of S&P 500 ETFs Rises To All Time High
    Barclays Thinks Its Dark Pool Is Fine
    Are You A .Ninja Or A .Guru?
    GM Recalls Far From Calamity For Some Dealers Who Find New Customers, Business
    Stock Futures Dip On Weak Results; Durable Goods Data Due
    Russian Consumer Watchdog Seeks Ban On Some McDonalds’ Products
    Euro, Shares Sag As Ukraine Woes Hit German Confidence
    In China Meat Scandal, McDonald’s Japan Switches To Thai Chicken, No Nuggets In Hong Kong
    Read more from Investing...

    Liberty Investor Digest

    Get today's most important
    financial headlines all in
    one place by email!



    Sources


    close[X]

    Sign Up For Liberty Investor Digest™!

    Get Liberty Investor Digest FREE By Email!

    Input your name and email address in the fields below and get today's most important financial headlines sent straight to you inbox!

    Privacy PolicyYou can opt-out at any time. We protect your information like a mother hen. We will not sell or rent your email address to anyone for any reason.