Categories

Investing Observation & Opinion

Tools

  • Economy & Politics
  • Investing
  • Personal Finance
  • Related Posts


    An Oil Contrarian Has Scored Another Coup Against His Wall Street Rivals
    Technical Glitch Downs Bank Of England’s $110 Trillion Payments System
    How Far Will The Stock Market Rebound Go?
    Euro Risk Due To Possible Return Of Italy To Lira – Drachmas, Escudos, Pesetas And Punts?
    Futures Fade Entire Overnight Rally
    Three Of The Four JPMorgan ‘Market Bottom’ Indicators Are All Flashing ‘Oversold’ Green
    The Crowded ‘Long-Dollar’ Train Just Got Even More Crowded
    When Confidence Crumbles
    The Commodities Trading Cheat-Sheet
    Why The Argentinean Situation Should Make You Buy Gold
    Post-Taper Tantrum II: The Week Ahead
    IBM Ditches 2015 Operating EPS Target, Shares Slump
    Faster ‘Cloud’ Orders For SAP Hurt 2014 Profit Outlook
    Valeant Reports Better-than-expected Profit, Raises Forecast
    Futures Lower As Weak IBM Earnings Weigh


    174 ETFs You Should Never Buy

    My apologies, but I misspoke last week.

    The most dangerous, wealth-destroying investment in the world right now isn’t cash. It’s leveraged exchange-traded funds (ETFs).

    By my count, there are at least 174 of these in existence. And on the surface, these ETFs promise to double or triple the movements of the underlying markets they track.

    I’m here to tell you that they’ll do anything but.

    You see, double- and triple-leveraged ETFs (whether long or short) pack a nasty surprise. It’s almost unbelievable, actually.

    And particularly in this volatile market, theses ETFs are hardwired for losses.

    Here’s what I mean.

    The Nuts And Bolts Of Leveraged ETFs

    Leveraged ETFs have been around only since 2006.

    Given such newness, let’s first make sure we’re all on the same page regarding the general mechanics of how they work.

    A normal ETF is constructed to mirror the movement of an underlying index. If the index rises 5 percent, the ETF that’s tracking it is supposed to rise 5 percent (before expenses). And an inverse ETF simply moves in the opposite direction of the index that it’s tracking. So if the index drops 5 percent, the inverse ETF should rise 5 percent.

    When you apply leverage, however, these movements are magnified. So if the inverse ETF uses three-times leverage and the index falls 5 percent, the ETF should rise 15 percent.

    Sounds simple enough in theory, right?

    Too bad the reality doesn’t measure up. Or, as Yogi Berra used to say, “In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. But in practice, there is.”

    Leverage? What Leverage?

    Consider this: From January to May 15, 2009, the Russell 1000 Financial Services Index fell by 5.9 percent.

    So a long ETF using three-times leverage should have dropped by 17.7 percent (-5.9 x 3 = -17.7 percent). Instead, it plummeted by 65.6 percent.

    And an inverse ETF using three-times leverage should have been up 17.7 percent. But it sank by 83.4 percent.

    Talk about not getting what you paid for.

    Pick any other period, and I promise it will yield similarly confounding results. And the worst offenders will always be the ETFs using three-times leverage.

    The question is: Why?

    Two Fatal Flaws of Leveraged ETFs

    Just so we’re clear, I don’t detest all ETFs.

    Regular ETFs provide a low-cost way to achieve instant diversification and access markets that aren’t readily available. And unlike traditional mutual funds, they provide intraday liquidity.

    But when it comes to leveraged ETFs, those benefits are completely nullified by two fatal flaws.

    Fatal Flaw No. 1: Daily Rebalancing

    Leveraged ETFs don’t actually buy individual stocks. Instead, they invest in derivatives. And these derivatives require daily rebalancing in order to match the rise or fall in the index. Otherwise, the leverage ratio for the ETF will be off-kilter. That means leveraged ETFs can only be counted on to perform (as promised) for a single day.

    In other words, they’re for day traders only — not investors.

    But this distinction isn’t being communicated clearly to investors. As a result, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission actually felt the need to issue its own warning about the confusion surrounding leveraged ETFs.

    Fatal Flaw No. 2: The ‘Dark Magic’ Of Compounding

    For years, we’ve been wooed by the magic of compounding returns. If you’re 18 years old and invest $2,000 per year for three years (and not a penny more after that), they say you’ll end up a millionaire if you simply leave it invested and let compounding work its magic.

    But when it comes to leveraged ETFs, compounding often works against us.

    For example, consider what would happen if a regular ETF drops by 10 percent one day, then rises by 10 percent the next. (And for simplicity’s sake, let’s assume the starting value of the index it tracks is 100.)

    • Day 1: The ETF would be down 10 percent to $90.
    • Day 2: It would rise by 10 percent to reach an ending value of $99.

    Total Return: -1 percent

    Now let’s take a look at what happens with an ETF that seeks double the return of the index (i.e., uses two-times leverage). Again, we’ll assume a starting value of $100.

    • Day 1: The ETF would be down 20 percent to $80.
    • Day 2: It would rise by 20 percent to reach an ending value of $96.

    Total Return: -4 percent (when it should actually be down only 2 percent)

    If we ratchet up the leverage to three-times and extend the holding period, it magnifies the negative impact of compounding. Toss in some market volatility, which we’re experiencing now, and this tracking error gets even worse.

    Bottom line: Beneath a simple exterior and the allure of a novel hedging strategy, there are considerable complexities and risks associated with leveraged ETFs.

    Unless you’re a day trader with an uncanny ability to predict every jot and tittle of the market, avoid leveraged ETFs like the plague. Heck, even if you could pull off such a feat, the transaction costs would eat your portfolio alive.

    So the best bet is to simply avoid leveraged ETFs altogether.

    Ahead of the tape,

    — Louis Basenese

    Louis Basenese Co-Founder, Chief Investment Strategist for Wall Street Daily. A former Wall Street consultant and analyst, Louis helped direct over $1 billion in institutional capital before founding Wall Street Daily where he serves as Chief Investment Strategist. In addition to being an expert on technology and small-cap stocks, Louis is also well versed in special situations, including Mergers & Acquisitions and spinoffs.

    | All posts from Louis Basenese

    Discuss this Story:

    Comment Policy: We encourage open discussion. Comments including racist statements, profanity, name calling or spam will be removed at our discretion. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear it is likely because it violates the policy.

    Marc Andreessen To Quit EBay Board
    Adidas Shares Jump On Report Of Bid For Reebok Unit
    Solid Data, Earnings Push World Stocks Higher
    IBM To Pay Globalfoundries To Take Chip Unit
    Market Action Reinforces Need For Policy Patience: Fed’s Rosengren
    Microsoft Plans To Launch Smartwatch Within Weeks
    Business Jet Sales To Keep Rising But Some Purchases Delayed
    Does Wall Street Have Another Wild Week Ahead?
    IBM To Make ‘Major’ Announcement Today
    Real Books Can Defeat Amazon And E-books
    Michigan Weighs Whether To Bar Tesla
    ‘Stock-tober’ Plunge Tame Compared To 1987
    3 Ways To Gain From Market Losses
    Don’t Fall For This Online Investing Pitch
    30 Undervalued Stocks For Those Who Think Patience Is A Virtue
    Here Is Why The Russell 2000 Has Not Only Shaken Off The Market Rout, But Is Rising
    Futures Surge After ECB Verbal Intervention Talks Up Stocks, Day After Fed
    Jim Rogers Warns: Albert Edwards Is Right “Sell Everything & Run For Your Lives”
    Apart From Ebola (And Inflation), These Are The Greatest Dangers To The World
    Thomas R. Frieden Should Resign From The CDC. And We Need A Travel Ban.
    Morgan Stanley Profit Jumps 87 Percent As Trading Activity Rebounds
    Futures Jump On Fed Speculation, Results
    GE Profit Tops Estimates As Margins Improve
    Europe Rides Rebound As Global Sell-off Abates
    Chipmaker SanDisk Forecasts Lower Revenue
    Apple’s New IPads Sport Modest Upgrades But Short On ‘Wow’
    Wells Fargo To Shut Its ‘Dark Pool’ As Demand Falls
    Goldman Sachs In Talks To Acquire ETF Provider IndexIQ
    Retirement Investing Advice In A Volatile Market
    Stocks Mixed; Dow Falls For 6th Straight Day
    Read more from Investing...

    Liberty Investor Digest

    Get today's most important
    financial headlines all in
    one place by email!



    Sources


    close[X]

    Sign Up For Liberty Investor Digest™!

    Get Liberty Investor Digest FREE By Email!

    Input your name and email address in the fields below and get today's most important financial headlines sent straight to you inbox!

    Privacy PolicyYou can opt-out at any time. We protect your information like a mother hen. We will not sell or rent your email address to anyone for any reason.