Investing Observation & Opinion


  • Economy & Politics
  • Investing
  • Personal Finance
  • Related Posts

    Is The ‘Easy’ Money Over For European Stocks?
    Europe Cracks Down On Bitcoin, Virtual Currencies To “Curb Terrorism Funding”
    For Caterpillar The Depression Has Never Been Worse… But It Has A Cunning Plan How To Deal With It
    A Modest Proposal: All Companies Should Shut Down At Age 18
    Star Wars Could Break Box Office Records After This News
    Leave Bitcoin Alone. Abolish Cash Instead.
    What UnitedHealth Doesn’t Mean For Obamacare
    This Could Be The Next Weapon Of Mass Destruction
    Warren Buffett Stocks To Ditch In 2015
    What Are The Stock Buyback Benefits For Investors?
    The Eerie Link Between The Federal Reserve And The Sinking Of The Titanic
    What The $16.6 Billion Nokia Merger Means For Investors Today
    New Salmon Is The First GM Animal Approved For Sale As Food
    Wal-Mart Scrimped On Hiring As Store Space Grew Rapidly
    Aetna Says Individual Obamacare Business Performing As Expected

    174 ETFs You Should Never Buy

    My apologies, but I misspoke last week.

    The most dangerous, wealth-destroying investment in the world right now isn’t cash. It’s leveraged exchange-traded funds (ETFs).

    By my count, there are at least 174 of these in existence. And on the surface, these ETFs promise to double or triple the movements of the underlying markets they track.

    I’m here to tell you that they’ll do anything but.

    You see, double- and triple-leveraged ETFs (whether long or short) pack a nasty surprise. It’s almost unbelievable, actually.

    And particularly in this volatile market, theses ETFs are hardwired for losses.

    Here’s what I mean.

    The Nuts And Bolts Of Leveraged ETFs

    Leveraged ETFs have been around only since 2006.

    Given such newness, let’s first make sure we’re all on the same page regarding the general mechanics of how they work.

    A normal ETF is constructed to mirror the movement of an underlying index. If the index rises 5 percent, the ETF that’s tracking it is supposed to rise 5 percent (before expenses). And an inverse ETF simply moves in the opposite direction of the index that it’s tracking. So if the index drops 5 percent, the inverse ETF should rise 5 percent.

    When you apply leverage, however, these movements are magnified. So if the inverse ETF uses three-times leverage and the index falls 5 percent, the ETF should rise 15 percent.

    Sounds simple enough in theory, right?

    Too bad the reality doesn’t measure up. Or, as Yogi Berra used to say, “In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. But in practice, there is.”

    Leverage? What Leverage?

    Consider this: From January to May 15, 2009, the Russell 1000 Financial Services Index fell by 5.9 percent.

    So a long ETF using three-times leverage should have dropped by 17.7 percent (-5.9 x 3 = -17.7 percent). Instead, it plummeted by 65.6 percent.

    And an inverse ETF using three-times leverage should have been up 17.7 percent. But it sank by 83.4 percent.

    Talk about not getting what you paid for.

    Pick any other period, and I promise it will yield similarly confounding results. And the worst offenders will always be the ETFs using three-times leverage.

    The question is: Why?

    Two Fatal Flaws of Leveraged ETFs

    Just so we’re clear, I don’t detest all ETFs.

    Regular ETFs provide a low-cost way to achieve instant diversification and access markets that aren’t readily available. And unlike traditional mutual funds, they provide intraday liquidity.

    But when it comes to leveraged ETFs, those benefits are completely nullified by two fatal flaws.

    Fatal Flaw No. 1: Daily Rebalancing

    Leveraged ETFs don’t actually buy individual stocks. Instead, they invest in derivatives. And these derivatives require daily rebalancing in order to match the rise or fall in the index. Otherwise, the leverage ratio for the ETF will be off-kilter. That means leveraged ETFs can only be counted on to perform (as promised) for a single day.

    In other words, they’re for day traders only — not investors.

    But this distinction isn’t being communicated clearly to investors. As a result, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission actually felt the need to issue its own warning about the confusion surrounding leveraged ETFs.

    Fatal Flaw No. 2: The ‘Dark Magic’ Of Compounding

    For years, we’ve been wooed by the magic of compounding returns. If you’re 18 years old and invest $2,000 per year for three years (and not a penny more after that), they say you’ll end up a millionaire if you simply leave it invested and let compounding work its magic.

    But when it comes to leveraged ETFs, compounding often works against us.

    For example, consider what would happen if a regular ETF drops by 10 percent one day, then rises by 10 percent the next. (And for simplicity’s sake, let’s assume the starting value of the index it tracks is 100.)

    • Day 1: The ETF would be down 10 percent to $90.
    • Day 2: It would rise by 10 percent to reach an ending value of $99.

    Total Return: -1 percent

    Now let’s take a look at what happens with an ETF that seeks double the return of the index (i.e., uses two-times leverage). Again, we’ll assume a starting value of $100.

    • Day 1: The ETF would be down 20 percent to $80.
    • Day 2: It would rise by 20 percent to reach an ending value of $96.

    Total Return: -4 percent (when it should actually be down only 2 percent)

    If we ratchet up the leverage to three-times and extend the holding period, it magnifies the negative impact of compounding. Toss in some market volatility, which we’re experiencing now, and this tracking error gets even worse.

    Bottom line: Beneath a simple exterior and the allure of a novel hedging strategy, there are considerable complexities and risks associated with leveraged ETFs.

    Unless you’re a day trader with an uncanny ability to predict every jot and tittle of the market, avoid leveraged ETFs like the plague. Heck, even if you could pull off such a feat, the transaction costs would eat your portfolio alive.

    So the best bet is to simply avoid leveraged ETFs altogether.

    Ahead of the tape,

    — Louis Basenese

    Louis Basenese Co-Founder, Chief Investment Strategist for Wall Street Daily. A former Wall Street consultant and analyst, Louis helped direct over $1 billion in institutional capital before founding Wall Street Daily where he serves as Chief Investment Strategist. In addition to being an expert on technology and small-cap stocks, Louis is also well versed in special situations, including Mergers & Acquisitions and spinoffs.

    | All posts from Louis Basenese

    Discuss this Story:

    Comment Policy: We encourage open discussion. Comments including racist statements, profanity, name calling or spam will be removed at our discretion. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear it is likely because it violates the policy.

    Oil Trades Near Three-month Low As Excess Supply Takes Toll
    Number Of $5 Billion-plus Takeover Deals Hits Record
    Investor Gabelli Joins Millennials Cutting The Cable Cord
    Gap Cuts Full-year Profit Forecast As Dollar Weighs
    This Is How GOLD Acted During Past Rising Rate Cycles
    Tumbling Treasury Yields Signal Possible Fed ‘Policy Error’ Being Priced In
    WTI Tumbles Back Below $40, Goldman Warns Risk Of “Sharp Leg Lower”
    Former Subway Pitchman Jared Fogle Is About To Be Sentenced
    This Is The Biggest Diamond Found In More Than A Century
    What ISIS ‘Blood Oil’ Really Means For Oil Markets
    The Day Before Thanksgiving Actually Isn’t The Busiest Time To Fly
    Gender Equality Is Now Better In Rwanda Than In The US
    Anonymous Could Hobble ISIS By Hacking PlayStation Consoles
    The Best Advice If You Find Yourself In A Terror Attack: Do Not Play Dead
    Not Much Evidence Mass Surveillance Works
    Home Depot & Lowes Avoid The Retail Bloodbath With Strong Earnings
    It’s REIT Time: Stock Up Durable Dividends Now
    A Global Financial Literacy Test Finds That Just 57% Of Adults In U.S. Are Financially Literate
    Starboard Asks Yahoo To Drop Alibaba Stake Spinoff Plans
    Oil Slides Again As Focus Returns To Heavy Glut
    Best Buy Comparable Sales Miss On Low Demand For Mobile Devices
    Stock Futures Rise After Fed Minutes Soothe Investor Nerves
    U.S. Consumers Favor Amazon For Online Holiday Shopping
    Pfizer-Allergan Talks Accelerate Amid New Inversion Clamp-down
    Soothing Fed Sounds Send Shares, Emerging Markets Higher
    Crude Tumbles To $40 Handle After DOE Confirms Significant Cushing Inventory Build
    U.S. May Bring Criminal Charges Against JP Morgan, RBS Executives, Prosecutors Pretend
    BlackRock Liquidates Its Macro Hedge Fund Following Worst Loss Since Inception, Surge In Redemptions
    It Will SUNE Be Over: Axiom Says SunEdison “Credit Event Appears More Likely”, Sees Price Dropping To $2/Share
    Read more from Investing...

    Liberty Investor Digest

    Get today's most important
    financial headlines all in
    one place by email!



    Sign Up For Liberty Investor Digest™!

    Get Liberty Investor Digest FREE By Email!

    Input your name and email address in the fields below and get today's most important financial headlines sent straight to you inbox!

    Privacy PolicyYou can opt-out at any time. We protect your information like a mother hen. We will not sell or rent your email address to anyone for any reason.