Investing Observation & Opinion


  • Economy & Politics
  • Investing
  • Personal Finance
  • Related Posts

    Scientists Discovered 200 New Species In The Himalayas—And We’re Slowly Killing Them All
    China—Not Online Porn—Is Why Playboy Is Dumping Nude Photographs
    GE To Sell $30 Billion Specialty Finance Business To Wells Fargo
    Twitter To Cut Up To 8 Percent Of Global Workforce
    Oil Steady On IEA Report, U.S. Output Forecast
    EMC To Pay Dell $2 Billion If It Opts For Higher Bid In Go-shop Period
    Strong Dollar Eats Into J&J Quarterly Sales
    Stock Futures Fall On Weak China Trade Data
    Citi Dials Down Risky Block Trading Amid Market Turmoil
    Investment Firm Fortress To Shutter Its Macro Hedge Fund
    How We’ll Clean Up Riding This Historic M&A Wave
    Intel’s New Chip Tech Will Revitalize Earnings
    Why The Price Of Gold Hit A 7-Week High Yesterday
    Trouble Ahead: Stocks Gain, but the “Super Crash” Is Accelerating
    What OPEC’s New Romance With Russia Means For Oil Prices

    174 ETFs You Should Never Buy

    My apologies, but I misspoke last week.

    The most dangerous, wealth-destroying investment in the world right now isn’t cash. It’s leveraged exchange-traded funds (ETFs).

    By my count, there are at least 174 of these in existence. And on the surface, these ETFs promise to double or triple the movements of the underlying markets they track.

    I’m here to tell you that they’ll do anything but.

    You see, double- and triple-leveraged ETFs (whether long or short) pack a nasty surprise. It’s almost unbelievable, actually.

    And particularly in this volatile market, theses ETFs are hardwired for losses.

    Here’s what I mean.

    The Nuts And Bolts Of Leveraged ETFs

    Leveraged ETFs have been around only since 2006.

    Given such newness, let’s first make sure we’re all on the same page regarding the general mechanics of how they work.

    A normal ETF is constructed to mirror the movement of an underlying index. If the index rises 5 percent, the ETF that’s tracking it is supposed to rise 5 percent (before expenses). And an inverse ETF simply moves in the opposite direction of the index that it’s tracking. So if the index drops 5 percent, the inverse ETF should rise 5 percent.

    When you apply leverage, however, these movements are magnified. So if the inverse ETF uses three-times leverage and the index falls 5 percent, the ETF should rise 15 percent.

    Sounds simple enough in theory, right?

    Too bad the reality doesn’t measure up. Or, as Yogi Berra used to say, “In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. But in practice, there is.”

    Leverage? What Leverage?

    Consider this: From January to May 15, 2009, the Russell 1000 Financial Services Index fell by 5.9 percent.

    So a long ETF using three-times leverage should have dropped by 17.7 percent (-5.9 x 3 = -17.7 percent). Instead, it plummeted by 65.6 percent.

    And an inverse ETF using three-times leverage should have been up 17.7 percent. But it sank by 83.4 percent.

    Talk about not getting what you paid for.

    Pick any other period, and I promise it will yield similarly confounding results. And the worst offenders will always be the ETFs using three-times leverage.

    The question is: Why?

    Two Fatal Flaws of Leveraged ETFs

    Just so we’re clear, I don’t detest all ETFs.

    Regular ETFs provide a low-cost way to achieve instant diversification and access markets that aren’t readily available. And unlike traditional mutual funds, they provide intraday liquidity.

    But when it comes to leveraged ETFs, those benefits are completely nullified by two fatal flaws.

    Fatal Flaw No. 1: Daily Rebalancing

    Leveraged ETFs don’t actually buy individual stocks. Instead, they invest in derivatives. And these derivatives require daily rebalancing in order to match the rise or fall in the index. Otherwise, the leverage ratio for the ETF will be off-kilter. That means leveraged ETFs can only be counted on to perform (as promised) for a single day.

    In other words, they’re for day traders only — not investors.

    But this distinction isn’t being communicated clearly to investors. As a result, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission actually felt the need to issue its own warning about the confusion surrounding leveraged ETFs.

    Fatal Flaw No. 2: The ‘Dark Magic’ Of Compounding

    For years, we’ve been wooed by the magic of compounding returns. If you’re 18 years old and invest $2,000 per year for three years (and not a penny more after that), they say you’ll end up a millionaire if you simply leave it invested and let compounding work its magic.

    But when it comes to leveraged ETFs, compounding often works against us.

    For example, consider what would happen if a regular ETF drops by 10 percent one day, then rises by 10 percent the next. (And for simplicity’s sake, let’s assume the starting value of the index it tracks is 100.)

    • Day 1: The ETF would be down 10 percent to $90.
    • Day 2: It would rise by 10 percent to reach an ending value of $99.

    Total Return: -1 percent

    Now let’s take a look at what happens with an ETF that seeks double the return of the index (i.e., uses two-times leverage). Again, we’ll assume a starting value of $100.

    • Day 1: The ETF would be down 20 percent to $80.
    • Day 2: It would rise by 20 percent to reach an ending value of $96.

    Total Return: -4 percent (when it should actually be down only 2 percent)

    If we ratchet up the leverage to three-times and extend the holding period, it magnifies the negative impact of compounding. Toss in some market volatility, which we’re experiencing now, and this tracking error gets even worse.

    Bottom line: Beneath a simple exterior and the allure of a novel hedging strategy, there are considerable complexities and risks associated with leveraged ETFs.

    Unless you’re a day trader with an uncanny ability to predict every jot and tittle of the market, avoid leveraged ETFs like the plague. Heck, even if you could pull off such a feat, the transaction costs would eat your portfolio alive.

    So the best bet is to simply avoid leveraged ETFs altogether.

    Ahead of the tape,

    — Louis Basenese

    Louis Basenese Co-Founder, Chief Investment Strategist for Wall Street Daily. A former Wall Street consultant and analyst, Louis helped direct over $1 billion in institutional capital before founding Wall Street Daily where he serves as Chief Investment Strategist. In addition to being an expert on technology and small-cap stocks, Louis is also well versed in special situations, including Mergers & Acquisitions and spinoffs.

    | All posts from Louis Basenese

    Discuss this Story:

    Comment Policy: We encourage open discussion. Comments including racist statements, profanity, name calling or spam will be removed at our discretion. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear it is likely because it violates the policy.

    Why Gold Is Surging: BofA Says To Expect A ‘Massive Policy Shift In 2016’
    Ruble, Lira, & Ringgit Tumble On USD, Yuan Gains As PBOC States “China Correction Nearly Over”
    Six Takeaways From Dell-EMC Deal
    Why Doug Kass Shorted Apple
    Gross V. PIMCO: The Star Fund Manager Cult Is Dead, And That’s A Good Thing.
    Four Signs That Silicon Valley’s Tech Bubble Is Bursting
    Could The Market Crash? Here’s What You Need To Know NOW!
    The Chinese Government Just Issued A Draft Law That Bodes Poorly For Uber
    Stocks, Awaiting Earnings Tomorrow, Set For Pause After Big Rally Last Week
    Eli Lilly Ends Drug Development; Shares Plunge
    Falling Commodity Prices A Boon For Some
    The Best Time To Take A Work Break
    WSJ, Barrons Hacked; CEO Warns Of Wider Plot
    Only One CEO Tops Jobs For ‘Monster’ Returns
    Your Smart Home Knows A Lot About You
    Etsy Sellers Doubt Amazon Handmade Is A “Killer”
    AB InBev Has Made New Approach To SABMiller
    FTC Review Date For Staples-Office Depot Deal Extended
    Europe Shares Pause; Dollar Dips On U.S. Rate Outlook
    Dell To Acquire EMC In $67 Billion Record Tech Deal
    Oil Rises After Kuwait Sees Higher Prices Ahead
    Stock Futures Little Changed Ahead Of Busy Earnings Week
    China Quality Watchdog Says ‘Highly Concerned’ About VW Emissions Issue
    Ex-Rabobank Traders Face First U.S. Trial Over Libor Manipulation
    EMC To Shop Itself After Deal With Dell – Sources
    OPEC Secretary-general Says Confident Of More Balanced Oil Market In 2016
    Mark Your Calendar: Bear Market Profits Start October 31
    The World Is Ending? Invest As If It Won’t.
    Day After Deutsche Bank Admits Not All Is Well, Swiss Giant Credit Suisse Also Admits It Needs More Cash
    Syrian Crisis: What Will Happen Next?
    Read more from Investing...

    Liberty Investor Digest

    Get today's most important
    financial headlines all in
    one place by email!



    Sign Up For Liberty Investor Digest™!

    Get Liberty Investor Digest FREE By Email!

    Input your name and email address in the fields below and get today's most important financial headlines sent straight to you inbox!

    Privacy PolicyYou can opt-out at any time. We protect your information like a mother hen. We will not sell or rent your email address to anyone for any reason.