Categories

Investing Observation & Opinion

Tools

  • Economy & Politics
  • Investing
  • Personal Finance
  • Related Posts


    Why You Should Avoid Most New Mutual Funds
    China Stocks Tumble Most In Six Months; US Futures Lower As Key Risk Events Loom
    Why Worry? The Two Scariest Charts In The World
    The Consequences Of Fracking: Two Clashing Views
    EMC Revenue At Risk In $10 Billion Document Security Market
    Is This IPO The Next Tesla?
    Why Most People Aren’t Downloading Apps Anymore
    Londoners Can Now Pay For Commutes By Waving Their Credit Cards—No Apple Pay Required
    The Truth Behind The Dangerous “Helicopter Money” Delusion
    4 Oil Stocks To Buy To Play The Permian Basin Oil Boom
    Microsoft: The Comeback Has Only Just Begun
    2 Of The Best Biotech Stocks To Buy Now
    Silver Futures Will Soon Pull Prices Out Of Recent Slump
    ADRs Dominate Early Trading On Wall Street
    Calpers Dumps Hedge Funds Citing Cost, To Pull $4 Billion Stake


    174 ETFs You Should Never Buy

    My apologies, but I misspoke last week.

    The most dangerous, wealth-destroying investment in the world right now isn’t cash. It’s leveraged exchange-traded funds (ETFs).

    By my count, there are at least 174 of these in existence. And on the surface, these ETFs promise to double or triple the movements of the underlying markets they track.

    I’m here to tell you that they’ll do anything but.

    You see, double- and triple-leveraged ETFs (whether long or short) pack a nasty surprise. It’s almost unbelievable, actually.

    And particularly in this volatile market, theses ETFs are hardwired for losses.

    Here’s what I mean.

    The Nuts And Bolts Of Leveraged ETFs

    Leveraged ETFs have been around only since 2006.

    Given such newness, let’s first make sure we’re all on the same page regarding the general mechanics of how they work.

    A normal ETF is constructed to mirror the movement of an underlying index. If the index rises 5 percent, the ETF that’s tracking it is supposed to rise 5 percent (before expenses). And an inverse ETF simply moves in the opposite direction of the index that it’s tracking. So if the index drops 5 percent, the inverse ETF should rise 5 percent.

    When you apply leverage, however, these movements are magnified. So if the inverse ETF uses three-times leverage and the index falls 5 percent, the ETF should rise 15 percent.

    Sounds simple enough in theory, right?

    Too bad the reality doesn’t measure up. Or, as Yogi Berra used to say, “In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. But in practice, there is.”

    Leverage? What Leverage?

    Consider this: From January to May 15, 2009, the Russell 1000 Financial Services Index fell by 5.9 percent.

    So a long ETF using three-times leverage should have dropped by 17.7 percent (-5.9 x 3 = -17.7 percent). Instead, it plummeted by 65.6 percent.

    And an inverse ETF using three-times leverage should have been up 17.7 percent. But it sank by 83.4 percent.

    Talk about not getting what you paid for.

    Pick any other period, and I promise it will yield similarly confounding results. And the worst offenders will always be the ETFs using three-times leverage.

    The question is: Why?

    Two Fatal Flaws of Leveraged ETFs

    Just so we’re clear, I don’t detest all ETFs.

    Regular ETFs provide a low-cost way to achieve instant diversification and access markets that aren’t readily available. And unlike traditional mutual funds, they provide intraday liquidity.

    But when it comes to leveraged ETFs, those benefits are completely nullified by two fatal flaws.

    Fatal Flaw No. 1: Daily Rebalancing

    Leveraged ETFs don’t actually buy individual stocks. Instead, they invest in derivatives. And these derivatives require daily rebalancing in order to match the rise or fall in the index. Otherwise, the leverage ratio for the ETF will be off-kilter. That means leveraged ETFs can only be counted on to perform (as promised) for a single day.

    In other words, they’re for day traders only — not investors.

    But this distinction isn’t being communicated clearly to investors. As a result, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission actually felt the need to issue its own warning about the confusion surrounding leveraged ETFs.

    Fatal Flaw No. 2: The ‘Dark Magic’ Of Compounding

    For years, we’ve been wooed by the magic of compounding returns. If you’re 18 years old and invest $2,000 per year for three years (and not a penny more after that), they say you’ll end up a millionaire if you simply leave it invested and let compounding work its magic.

    But when it comes to leveraged ETFs, compounding often works against us.

    For example, consider what would happen if a regular ETF drops by 10 percent one day, then rises by 10 percent the next. (And for simplicity’s sake, let’s assume the starting value of the index it tracks is 100.)

    • Day 1: The ETF would be down 10 percent to $90.
    • Day 2: It would rise by 10 percent to reach an ending value of $99.

    Total Return: -1 percent

    Now let’s take a look at what happens with an ETF that seeks double the return of the index (i.e., uses two-times leverage). Again, we’ll assume a starting value of $100.

    • Day 1: The ETF would be down 20 percent to $80.
    • Day 2: It would rise by 20 percent to reach an ending value of $96.

    Total Return: -4 percent (when it should actually be down only 2 percent)

    If we ratchet up the leverage to three-times and extend the holding period, it magnifies the negative impact of compounding. Toss in some market volatility, which we’re experiencing now, and this tracking error gets even worse.

    Bottom line: Beneath a simple exterior and the allure of a novel hedging strategy, there are considerable complexities and risks associated with leveraged ETFs.

    Unless you’re a day trader with an uncanny ability to predict every jot and tittle of the market, avoid leveraged ETFs like the plague. Heck, even if you could pull off such a feat, the transaction costs would eat your portfolio alive.

    So the best bet is to simply avoid leveraged ETFs altogether.

    Ahead of the tape,

    — Louis Basenese

    Louis Basenese Co-Founder, Chief Investment Strategist for Wall Street Daily. A former Wall Street consultant and analyst, Louis helped direct over $1 billion in institutional capital before founding Wall Street Daily where he serves as Chief Investment Strategist. In addition to being an expert on technology and small-cap stocks, Louis is also well versed in special situations, including Mergers & Acquisitions and spinoffs.

    | All posts from Louis Basenese

    Discuss this Story:

    Comment Policy: We encourage open discussion. Comments including racist statements, profanity, name calling or spam will be removed at our discretion. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear it is likely because it violates the policy.

    U.S. Safety Chief Raps GM’s ‘Flawed’ Culture On Recalls
    ECB’s Predicament Leaves Peers Mute On Currency Depreciation
    Boeing-Lockheed Venture Said Teaming With Bezos On Rocket Engine
    As U.S. Farm Cycle Turns, Tractor Makers May Suffer Longer Than Farmers
    Russian Ruble Hits Historic Low Amid Sanctions
    Secret Reason Amazon Should Fear Alibaba
    States With The Rudest Drivers
    Wind Farms Kill Fewer Birds Than Towers, Cats
    Buick Winning Sales By Poking A Little Fun In Ads
    Study: Faulty Gas Wells, Not Fracking, Pollute
    Alibaba IPO Demand May Be Sinking Tech Stocks
    Germany’s ZF To Buy TRW Automotive For $12.4B
    Singapore And Hong Kong Race For Gold Benchmark – Use Brinks And Via Mat For Storage
    What Bull? 47 Percent Of Nasdaq Stocks In Bear Market, Down 24 Percent On Average
    Key Events In The Coming Week: Fed Votes, Scotland Votes, And More
    Empire Fed Spikes To 5-Year Highs; Employment Plunges To Worst Since December
    Do Not Let The ‘Strong’ Dollar Illusion Lead Your Wealth Preservation Strategies Astray
    Why The Rigging Of The Gold Market Matters
    Solar In Oil Drilling: Beat Them Or Join Them?
    On The Cliff At The Edge Of The “Permanently High Plateau”
    Automobiles Drag U.S. Factory Production Lower
    Heineken Confirms, Rebuffs SABMiller Bid
    Alibaba Worried About Facebook IPO As Considered Nasdaq Versus NYSE
    Startups Go Dutch For New Era In Manufacturing
    China Anxiety Knocks Shares, Oil
    Sinopec To Sell $17.5 Billion Retail Stake In Privatization Push
    Nissan Faces Battery Plant Cuts As Electric Car Hopes Fade
    Investors Team Up To Find Path Through Risky Dark Pools
    Central Banks Inflating ‘Elevated’ Asset Prices
    Rising Rates Pose Headwind For Stocks
    Read more from Investing...

    Liberty Investor Digest

    Get today's most important
    financial headlines all in
    one place by email!



    Sources


    close[X]

    Sign Up For Liberty Investor Digest™!

    Get Liberty Investor Digest FREE By Email!

    Input your name and email address in the fields below and get today's most important financial headlines sent straight to you inbox!

    Privacy PolicyYou can opt-out at any time. We protect your information like a mother hen. We will not sell or rent your email address to anyone for any reason.