Categories

Investing Liberty Investor Alert Observation & Opinion

Tools

  • Economy & Politics
  • Investing
  • Personal Finance
  • Related Posts


    Hyundai Recalling 883,000 Sonata Midsize Cars To Fix Problem With Gear Shift Levers
    Sprint’s Revenue Beats Estimate As Network Upgrade Progresses
    ADP Tumbles From June Exuberance, Misses 3rd Of Last 4 Months
    The Only Chart You Will Need To Trade Russian Sanctions
    Jim Grant: “Gold Is The Ultimate Inoculation Against Harebrained Central Bankers”
    Currency Wars Intensify As Russia Buys 18.6 Tonnes Of Gold In June
    Why Business Travelers Should Think Twice About Booking Through Airbnb
    How Solar Energy Storage Could Make Tesla Much More Than An Automaker
    Microsoft Can Still Compete In The Battle For Your Living Room
    Thomson Reuters Reports Rise In Revenue, Profit
    AstraZeneca Buys Almirall Lung Drugs For Up To $2.1 Billion
    Futures Up Ahead Of GDP Data; Twitter Soars In Premarket
    Euro Zone Sentiment Improves, Overcoming Ukraine Crisis Concern
    Upstart Trading Venue IEX Of ‘Flash Boys’ Fame May Prompt U.S. Market Rule Change
    Euro Touches Eight-month Low, European Shares Fall


    Blue Chip Stock Blues

    Just because a company is a big success now doesn’t mean that it’s guaranteed for the future. Instead, make sure you own companies that will be successes in times to follow.

    The market is full of well-known companies that have destroyed many a portfolio just because investors weren’t paying attention to the power of change.

    Blue chips: This is the term for companies that are supposed to be solid now and for decades to come. You’re supposed to be able to buy and own these and rest assured that you’re invested in industry and market leaders that will successfully grow in value without too much volatility and market risk.

    Too many individual investors buy so-called blue chip stocks without taking the time to get to know the companies behind the stocks and what might cause them to stumble and falter. They just hold and hope that everything will work out as advertised.

    But, too often, that doesn’t end up very well.

    Take a few of the former blue chips of the past. Remember Kodak? It was the company that was all about being the market leader in its industry, and it was supposedly going to keep bringing the next great series of products and services that the world couldn’t live without.

    Polaroid took what was supposed to be Kodak’s products and tried to take them to the next level. And, of course, both of these imaging and technology companies are really no longer with us. Think about the millions of shareholders who saw their blue chip companies go from the top to nothing and the impact that that had on their retirement portfolios.

    Then there’s Palm, the leader in smartphones and early touch-screen tablet devices from decades ago. It was one of the stocks that was showing up in countless mutual funds and investment accounts. Now, it’s all gone.

    You don’t want to be holding the bag when markets begin to realize that a company’s products are becoming obsolete. Yet millions of investors have done that — perhaps a few times over — all because they bought into the hype of the safety in buying big and popular stocks called blue chips.

    The key is to know what you’re investing in and why you’re buying it in the first place and to keep asking that question every time you open your brokerage statements. Don’t just follow the investing herd.

    When it comes to technology investing, for decades, any list of companies at the top of the heap has included Intel Corp. (INTC). The company has been famed for its chip sets and other products and services that for a time were ubiquitous in nearly every personal computer sold worldwide.

    As a result, for the 1990s through 2000, shareholders saw returns soar to the heavens with gains of more than 4,100 percent. No wonder it was not only a blue chip but also on most short lists of tech stocks to own.

    But with any market — especially technology — things change.

    Not only does competition emerge, but the markets change in demand for goods and services. From 2000 through the end of 2010, Intel stockholders lost more than 55 percent of what they had gained in the prior decade.

    During the current decade, Intel has gained only a measly 4 percent. Meanwhile, the Standard & Poor’s 500 index — even with all of the general market foibles — is up by more than 36 percent.

    And its peers in the PC market are faltering: from chipmaker Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD), which lost 75 percent so far this decade, to PC software maker Microsoft Corporation (MSFT), which is down more than 7 percent, to PC maker and vendor Dell, Inc. (DELL), which is down another 2 plus percent. Being tied to PCs, from desktops to laptops, has been a bad market in which to be trying to make a positive return.

    While no one is going to say that PCs are going completely the way of Polaroid, Palm or even Kodak, there is a warning here. More and more folks are using PCs less and mobile computers more. From smartphones to tablets, this is where demand is coming at a more heated pace for the chips, components and software.

    Intel has been trying to be relevant, but it just hasn’t been working. And while it thinks that it’s being a generous dividend payer (at about 22 cents a quarter), it’s hoarding a lot of cash that it might need to stay alive unless changes are made.

    This brings us to Apple, Inc. (AAPL). This company’s stock has shown up in seemingly every sort of mutual fund, from the most conservative to the most aggressive. Even value- and dividend-focused funds have been buyers of this stock, even though it hardly qualifies for either criterion.

    But do most investors understand the business model of the company or what the product development cycle is? And what is going to continue to justify the higher valuations for this technology and media content company?

    What has been hitting Intel, Microsoft and Dell might well be starting to chip away at Apple: a loss of its edge in knowing what the market wants before it knows what it wants and, in turn, delivering the well-engineered goods in innovative packaging.

    This is perhaps why Apple is beginning to be questioned, with the trailing six months showing losses for shareholders amounting to more than 32 percent or an annualized loss of more than 63 percent.

    Meanwhile, as a comparison, look at Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. (SSNLF). This company has continued to eat the lunch of its competitors. With its focus on mobile devices, it’s been trouncing Intel and its PC-fixed peers for many years. And it makes components that its peers need to buy to assemble most, if not all, of their goods — including Apple products. It also has a very successful business of building its own branded products.

    And while Apple has been slipping over the past six months, Samsung continues to perform up more than 20 percent, equating to an average annual return that’s a mirror opposite to Apple’s losses as seen in the graph below.

    Samsung vs. Apple

    And this recent performance is no fluke. In the past 10 years alone, shareholders have made more than 472 percent in total return. Samsung continues to bolster its sales gains year in and year by consistently predictable advances. In turn, the market continues to recognize the company’s performance with higher stock prices.

    The key in this contrast is that you need always to look forward with every stock that you own. Forget what worked before; always ask what is more likely to work in the future and invest accordingly. Just because a stock might be a blue chip now doesn’t mean that it will always stay in the black; it might eventually put you and your portfolio into the red.

    –Neil George

    Neil George is the editor of By George, an investment advisory publication. George was the editor of Personal Finance for many years. In addition, he served as editor for a collection of other investment journals published in the United States, Germany and other selected nations. Prior to his career in media, George worked for more than two decades on six continents in senior positions with a select group of financial institutions in investment banking, bond trading, brokerage and asset management. The institutions included Merrill Lynch International Bank in Europe, Asia and the Americas, as well as U.S. Bank and British- and Chinese-based Investec PLC. In addition, George worked to build a collection of independent public and private brokerage and fund-management companies in Los Angeles and New York. He also currently serves as an adjunct professor and board member of Webster University's Walker School of Business and Technology. George earned an MBA in international finance from Webster University in Europe and a bachelor's degree in economics from Kings College.

    | All posts from Neil George

    Discuss this Story:

    Comment Policy: We encourage open discussion. Comments including racist statements, profanity, name calling or spam will be removed at our discretion. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear it is likely because it violates the policy.

    Amazon To Invest $2 Billion More In India As E-commerce Race Heats Up
    Fed Seen Trimming Bond Buys, Could Offer Vague Rate Clues
    Energizer Profit Slides As Household Goods Sales Decline
    Humana Says Quarterly Profit Fell On Health Reform, Drug Costs
    Valero Tops Second-quarter Revenue Estimates, Shares Rise
    Tax Inversion Deals: Washington Blames Wall Street For Its Mess
    Where Have The Bulls Gone?
    Is This The Chart That Has High-Yield Investors Running For The Hills?
    China Regulator In Anti-monopoly Probe Of Microsoft
    Focus Turns To U.S. Outlook, Russian Stocks Stabilize
    McDonald’s Japan Withdraws Profit Guidance After China Food Scare
    BP Profit Jumps But Warns Of Russia Sanctions Impact
    Goldman Unit Eyes Foray Into China Amid Metals Financing Scandal
    Panasonic To Initially Invest $200-300 Million In Tesla Battery Plant
    Darden CEO Steps Down Amid Food Fight With Investors
    Herbalife Ltd. Shares Tumble After Hours On Weak Earnings Report
    Modi’s New India Is Off To A Bad Start
    Lloyds Got Creative To Manipulate Libor
    Is Gold Ready For China And Bitcoin?
    Dollar Tree To Buy Family Dollar For $8.5 Billion
    Trendy Chipotle Burritos Show How Pricing Power Belongs To The Hip
    “Reprehensible” Lloyds Bank Agrees To $105 Million Wristslap For Manipulating Libor
    Near-Record Trulia Shorts Crushed After Zillow Acquires Incomeless Company For $3.5 Billion
    US Equities Flat While China Surges On More Stimulus And Bailout Hopes
    Like Dripping Silver Icicles
    ‘London Fix’ Gold Rigging By Bullion Bank Exposed In Class Action Lawsuit: The Complete Charts
    It Is Mostly About The US Next Week
    If You Want To Be Rich And Powerful, Majoring In STEM Is A Good Place To Start
    The Threat Of Rising Rates
    Europe Nervy As Russian Assets Hit By New Sanctions Talk
    Read more from Investing...

    Liberty Investor Digest

    Get today's most important
    financial headlines all in
    one place by email!



    Sources


    close[X]

    Sign Up For Liberty Investor Digest™!

    Get Liberty Investor Digest FREE By Email!

    Input your name and email address in the fields below and get today's most important financial headlines sent straight to you inbox!

    Privacy PolicyYou can opt-out at any time. We protect your information like a mother hen. We will not sell or rent your email address to anyone for any reason.