Categories

Investing Observation & Opinion

Tools

  • Economy & Politics
  • Investing
  • Personal Finance
  • Related Posts


    ISIS Gets Angrier At America: ‘We Will Drown All Of You In Blood’
    Housing Permits, Starts Surge Driven By Renewed Rental Housing Scramble
    A Brief History Of US Money
    Starting This Year, Minorities Will Outnumber Whites In U.S. Public Schools
    Is Your Airline Poisoning You?
    What To Look For In Dueling Autopsies Of Michael Brown
    How To Profit From The World’s “Scariest” Stock Exchange
    Biogen Idec Gains On FDA Approval Of New MS Drug
    Silver Price Forecast This Week: Downside Speculation Mounting
    Why Investing In Solar Energy Is Attracting The Big Boys
    Strong Spring Sales Help Home Depot Beat Estimates
    BHP Unveils Spin-off But Disappoints With No Buyback
    Futures Higher After Home Depot Results, Data On Tap
    Stocks Head Higher As Risk Appetite Returns
    Heinz To Tighten Supplier Controls In China After Infant Food Scare


    History Holds Apple’s Future

    I hate to be right about such things. And I don’t want to wish ill on anyone. But I do want to say: I told you so. On Oct. 1, we posted an article I wrote about Apple Inc. (AAPL). The title was a rhetorical question: “Is This the End for Apple?

    Certainly, “the end” is a bit hyperbolic, but I think you know what I mean.

    Just 10 years ago, the stock was trading around 5. Now it’s more than 500. That’s quite a run.

    As far as I’m concerned, the man responsible for it all was Steve Jobs, the founder who at one point was banned from any corporate leadership. His vision built every major advancement the company has had — and may ever have.

    The problem is that this decade-long run is by a company that’s been around about 30 years. It’s living its salad days, but the question will be whether it can sustain some of this glory.

    Remember, when Jobs wasn’t at the helm (and even when he was), the company didn’t exactly flourish. The challenges it faces now are similar to the challenges it had before the iPod.

    On LinkedIn, I saw a piece by CNBC’s Herb Greenberg that lays out some of his concerns with Apple moving forward. I won’t go through them point by point, but his view does buttress my argument (and I beat him to press with my predictions).

    Apple is having a problem hitting homers with each release. And given its pricing premiums and the economic conditions today, consumers aren’t seeing the point in paying up.

    I have heard numerous stories of Apple fanatics who were so smitten with the company’s products that they would rush out to buy each new generation. No longer.

    Bandwidth Is The Great Leveler

    If you recall, Apple was never a big player in the old days. During the dot-com boom (when companies that didn’t even have business plans or revenue were going nuts), Apple was floundering.

    Its greatest challenges have been that it has maintained a closed system — a beautifully integrated and efficient universe, but closed all the same. And its equipment is expensive, relatively speaking.

    I know its stores (designed by Jobs) are amazing, its products will go down in history for their ability to marry form and function (again, Jobs driven), its operating systems are intuitive and customer service is great.

    But the company has a small share of the broader market and always has. Now, the iPad has dominated its niche; and, initially, apps for The iStore were pouring in. But there are far more apps available for Android devices. And now that broadband connectivity is available almost everywhere in the United States, the processing power and graphics are pretty universal. Music programs proliferate with the iTunes model as well as subscriber models.

    What’s more, as I’ve been watching the commercials for the iPhone 5, the improvements pitched on the commercials are incremental. And the cost to buy up is finally hitting increasingly price-sensitive consumers.

    As I noted in my previous article, a lot of Apple aficionados were tech-interested but not tech-savvy consumers. Apple was a brand that could get them into the new world of digital music, smart phones, laptops and tablets without their having to ask anyone how to work the damn thing every time they turned it on.

    But now, users are more discriminating consumers and more price inelastic. The most recent red flag is the fact that Apple has reduced production of the iPhone 5.

    Past As Prologue

    The underlying point is that Apple’s Achilles’ heel has always been the same: It builds great stuff for a selective audience and commands premium prices from its customers because of the entire “experience.” It’s kind of the Nordstrom Inc. (JWN) of tech, but it’s a lot more focused.

    For a while, thanks to Jobs, it built some of the coolest stuff on the planet. And each new model was cooler than the last, so no one really worried about not being able to transport their apps or music out of iTunes if they wanted to move over to Android.

    Then, competitors began to pull off some cool iterations of Apple’s products. Right now, the Samsung Galaxy S III and the Samsung Galaxy Note II are all the rage. About a month ago, I bought a Galaxy S III; the store manager told me he recommends that phone to everyone who is looking to upgrade — not the iPhone. That 20-something was not an Apple fan any longer, and he demos each new phone for a month.

    Just recently, I was in the AT&T store reworking my data plan. The regional sales manager was telling me she’s looking forward to getting the new Nokia Lumia 920 with Windows 8. She said she used her boss’ phone, and it was lightning-fast and very user friendly. Then, on CNBC the other day, one of the commentators also admitted that he was gravitating to the Lumina for his next phone. My wife, a longtime Apple fan, swapped her iPhone for a Galaxy S III.

    Speed and accessibility are no longer the province of Apple. And the Samsung devices are more affordable as well. That means more people will have less of a problem upgrading for incremental improvements.

    Apple stock is still a good value, but iPhone sales are said to make up around half of the company’s sales. Gross margins are down.

    We’ve seen other giant phone makers lose their mojo and go from the big dawgs to the big dogs: Motorola Solutions, Inc. (MSI), Ericsson (ERIC), Research in Motion Limited (RIMM) and Nokia Corporation (NOK).

    Since this whole sector has an indefinable “hip” factor and consumers are immensely fickle, this could be a very slippery and very steep slope. When this thing turns, it could go very quickly. The only way I would own Apple at this point in time is if I were on the short side of it or I bought it 10 years ago, and I’d be looking to sell if it broke 460.

    On the other hand, this may be a very good time to take a speculative position in Nokia.

    —GS Early

    Discuss this Story:

    Comment Policy: We encourage open discussion. Comments including racist statements, profanity, name calling or spam will be removed at our discretion. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear it is likely because it violates the policy.

    Dollar General Enters Race For Family Dollar With $8.95 Billion Bid
    Inflows To Hong Kong ETFs Soar As Foreigners Bet On Chinese Stocks
    Sprint Cuts Rates, CEO Says More New Plans To Come
    Why Tesla Stock Will Double In The Next 12 Months
    All Eyes On Jackson Hole: Key Events In The Coming Week
    Risk On After Ukraine’s “Convoy Shelling” Hoax Forgotten
    Passport’s John Burbank: “The Next Crisis May Look Like A 1987 Crash”
    If Not Trusting This Market Makes Me An Idiot, Then Call Me Crazy!
    Control The Language And You Control The Mind
    Ferguson Is Not Binary
    Red Cross Reverses Stance on Sandy Spending “Trade Secrets”
    Europe Shares Rally As Ukraine Fears Ease, Oil Drops
    China Finds Mercedes-Benz Guilty Of Price Fixing
    Dollar General Counters Dollar Tree Bid For Family Dollar
    With Cigars And Crystal, Volvo Makes Eyes At Chinese Rich
    U.S. Treasuries Set To Storm On As EU Yields Drop, Conflicts Threaten
    Federated Investors Sees S&P 500 At 2,500 In Two Years
    Credit Suisse Played Role In Espirito Santo Collapse
    Ackman Files Second Lawsuit Against U.S. Government
    Tesla Boosts Model S Sedan’s Warranty Coverage After Criticism
    War Does Nothing For Your Investments
    The Sad Devolution Of Discovery Channel
    The Unlikely Cause Uniting Netflix And The Big Cable Lobby
    The Best Business Hack? Good Manners.
    Why An Accounting Scandal At Alibaba’s New Film Company Spells Trouble
    Empire Manufacturing Tumbles Most In 2 Years, Biggest Miss In 4 Months
    The Gold & Silver Morning Smackdown Is Back
    Futures Continue Levitation On More “Deescalation” Hopes Despite UK Warning Russia Of “Serious Consequences”
    14 Reasons Why The U.S. Economy’s Bubble Of False Prosperity May Be About To Burst
    Top 7 Reasons To Buy Silver Now
    Read more from Investing...

    Liberty Investor Digest

    Get today's most important
    financial headlines all in
    one place by email!



    Sources


    close[X]

    Sign Up For Liberty Investor Digest™!

    Get Liberty Investor Digest FREE By Email!

    Input your name and email address in the fields below and get today's most important financial headlines sent straight to you inbox!

    Privacy PolicyYou can opt-out at any time. We protect your information like a mother hen. We will not sell or rent your email address to anyone for any reason.