Categories

Economy & Politics

Tools

  • Economy & Politics
  • Investing
  • Personal Finance
  • Related Posts


    Deutsche Bank’s Most Cynical Take On Draghi’s QE Yet: Buy European Stocks Even Though QE Will ‘Prevent Improvements’
    The Saudi Succession: Its Impact On Oil, Markets And Politics
    More Isolation? Russia, China To Build $240 Billion High-Speed Rail Link
    How China Deals With Deflation: A 60% Pay Raise For 39 Million Public Workers
    Evaporating Inflation And Growth Put Pressure On Central Banks
    Fed’s Solo Act Gets Tougher With ECB, Others In Stimulus Mode
    Democracy Is Good For Business
    Israeli Mossad Goes Rogue, Warns U.S. On Iran Sanctions
    Republican Chutzpah Won’t Kill Obamacare
    Mario Draghi Prepared Remarks Word Count: Inflation – 15; Deflation – 0
    Jobless Claims Over 300k For 3rd Week, Spike In Shale States
    Police Across America Are Using Radars To See Inside People’s Homes
    Why Republicans Should Embrace A 28% Tax On Capital Gains
    Deflation In 2015? These Four Charts Say Yes
    Japan Is Trying To Convince ISIL That Its Hostage Death Threats Are Misinformed


    Is Sequestration Really That Scary?

    The political football that is sequestration will be intentionally grounded today as lawmakers on both sides of the field decide how to approach the next play. In the meantime, cheerleaders for and against sequestration are holding pep rallies to fire up the public about what lies ahead — depending on who emerges victorious in the political gamesmanship.

    Many Republicans and independents have argued that if any government spending is going to be cut, it must be done by force; thus, lawmakers should allow the sequester to stand. According to Pew, about 49 percent of respondents to a recent poll said the cuts should be delayed. A surprising 40 percent said sequestration should be carried out. And even an impressive one-third of respondents who described themselves as Democrats favor full-on sequestration.

    Those who have aligned themselves squarely against any sort of sequestration are working overtime to alarm a populace that has been desensitized by story after story of the horrors of looming government cuts that rarely happen.

    Here are some of the more interesting “the sky is falling” sequester headlines:

    Wired reports that sequestration will lead to a backlog of delays in veteran funerals at Arlington National Cemetery:

    There’s currently an average of 31 funerals a day at Arlington, the nation’s most prestigious resting place for war veterans. But the Army expects that under the automatic budget cuts known as sequestration, that average will drop to 24. As first tweeted by CNN’s Barbara Starr, that works out to 160 fewer funerals every month.

    The Army says Arlington’s top priority is to bury troops killed in action in Afghanistan. That is not going to change under sequestration. Arlington representatives say that such burials typically take place within two weeks of receipt of the bodies of the fallen.

    Science Works for U.S. issued a press release this week, lamenting that sequestration will mean a drastic reduction in the amount of “basic scientific research”:

    George Washington University undergraduate research students April MacIntyre and Hamza Rahimi spoke of their concern that cuts to research would change the career plans of a generation of aspiring young scientists, doctors and engineers.

    Federal research funding provides “resources to educate bright students with a passion to change the world through science,” says Rahimi, a senior.  “Cuts from the sequestration will close off an essential pipeline, limiting the options of students across the country who are just like us, as well as damaging American competitiveness around the world,” he adds.

    NBC reports that air travel will be snarled as budget cuts at the Federal Aviation Administration and Transportation Security Administration will mean longer security lines.

    In a press release earlier this month, the White House Office of Management and Budget claimed that sequestration could lead to outbreaks of foodborne illness as food inspectors are laid off. Likewise, layoffs of workplace safety inspectors could lead to an increase of employee injuries throughout the Nation.

    And just about every mouthpiece representing any facet of America’s vast military-industrial complex has come out saying that sequester will put all Americans in danger.

    What has gone largely unmentioned in all of the sequestration sensationalism is that the Federal government will still spend more money in the year following sequestration than it did before the cuts took place.

    Do you think sequestration is really all that scary?

    Discuss this Story:

    Comment Policy: We encourage open discussion. Comments including racist statements, profanity, name calling or spam will be removed at our discretion. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear it is likely because it violates the policy.

    U.S. Jobless Claims Fall From Seven-month High
    ECB To Decide On Bond-buying Plan After Holding Rates
    At Least Six U.S. States Expect To Miss Revenue Targets
    Pentagon Still Cold To Big Defense Mergers
    Canada Surprise Rate Cut Keeps Housing Party Going
    Infrastructure: The State Of The Union’s Other Winner?
    Obama’s Pro-business Agenda Is What Will Actually Pass
    Yemen’s Houthis Are A Reminder Of Iran’s Sectarian Agenda In The Arab World
    Long Lines For Milk And Tampons Are Sinking Venezuela’s Government
    Yemen’s Rebels Hold US-Backed President ‘Captive’ In His House. Seize Country’s Largest Ballistic Missile Base
    People All Over The World Blame Bad Government Policy For Runaway Inequality
    Why 50 Percent Of ‘Exceptional’ America Gets Checks From Uncle Sam
    Saxo Bank Warns ‘This Is The Endgame For Central Banks’
    Big Central Bank Meetings Present An Opportunity To Profit
    Congress Set For Net Neutrality Battle
    States With The Highest (and Lowest) Gas Taxes
    Richest 1% Will Control Most Wealth By 2016
    Central Bankers Lurch From ‘Whatever It Takes’ To ‘Whatever Next’
    Supreme Court Rejects Challenge To Debit Card ‘Swipe Fees’ Rules
    Good News In China’s Bad GDP Numbers
    Argentina, Iran And The Mysterious Death Of A Prosecutor
    “Short-Term Greedy & Long-Term Poorer”
    Spot The Trend: The Richest 1 Percent Are About To Own Over Half Of Global Wealth
    Americans Are ‘Different’ From The Rest Of The World
    How The ECB’s QE Is About To Send The Most Deflationary Signal Ever
    Five Reasons To Pay Attention To Obama’s Lame-duck State Of The Union Tonight
    Does Chinese President Xi Jinping Really Earn Just $22,000 A Year?
    D.C.’s New Bosses Start To Pay Back Wall Street
    IMF Cuts Global Growth Outlook, Calls For Accommodative Policy
    China’s 2014 Economic Growth Misses Target, Hits 24-year Low
    Read more from Economy & Politics...

    Liberty Investor Digest

    Get today's most important
    financial headlines all in
    one place by email!



    Sources


    close[X]

    Sign Up For Liberty Investor Digest™!

    Get Liberty Investor Digest FREE By Email!

    Input your name and email address in the fields below and get today's most important financial headlines sent straight to you inbox!

    Privacy PolicyYou can opt-out at any time. We protect your information like a mother hen. We will not sell or rent your email address to anyone for any reason.