Categories

Economy & Politics

Tools

  • Economy & Politics
  • Investing
  • Personal Finance
  • Related Posts


    Nearly Two-thirds Of Americans Can’t Identify The Three Branches Of Government
    City Considers Allowing Police Warrantless Access To Homes To Check For Underage Drinking
    Kill ISIS With ‘A Weapons-Grade Entitlement Program’
    Rand Paul Delivers Pro-Liberty Message, Rips GOP
    This Is How Italy “Fixes” Its Unsustainable Debt Problem
    The PetroYuan Cometh: China Docks Navy Destroyer In Iran’s Strait Of Hormuz Port
    ISIS Slams “Mule Of The Jews” Obama, Demands Killing Of “Disbelievers” Especially “Filthy French”
    The U.S. Ponzi Economy
    150 Years Of Global Monetary Policy
    Pentagon Prepares To Unveil Syria War Plans As ‘Broad Coalition’ Crumbles
    Bobby Jindal Launches His Energy Plan
    This Industry Is Getting Faster-than-Inflation Gains Due To Regulation
    The War On Poverty: Failure Redefined As Success
    Wendy Davis Asks Greg Abbott To Ignore A Law She Voted For
    9th Circuit Agrees School Can Ban American Flag


    Is Sequestration Really That Scary?

    The political football that is sequestration will be intentionally grounded today as lawmakers on both sides of the field decide how to approach the next play. In the meantime, cheerleaders for and against sequestration are holding pep rallies to fire up the public about what lies ahead — depending on who emerges victorious in the political gamesmanship.

    Many Republicans and independents have argued that if any government spending is going to be cut, it must be done by force; thus, lawmakers should allow the sequester to stand. According to Pew, about 49 percent of respondents to a recent poll said the cuts should be delayed. A surprising 40 percent said sequestration should be carried out. And even an impressive one-third of respondents who described themselves as Democrats favor full-on sequestration.

    Those who have aligned themselves squarely against any sort of sequestration are working overtime to alarm a populace that has been desensitized by story after story of the horrors of looming government cuts that rarely happen.

    Here are some of the more interesting “the sky is falling” sequester headlines:

    Wired reports that sequestration will lead to a backlog of delays in veteran funerals at Arlington National Cemetery:

    There’s currently an average of 31 funerals a day at Arlington, the nation’s most prestigious resting place for war veterans. But the Army expects that under the automatic budget cuts known as sequestration, that average will drop to 24. As first tweeted by CNN’s Barbara Starr, that works out to 160 fewer funerals every month.

    The Army says Arlington’s top priority is to bury troops killed in action in Afghanistan. That is not going to change under sequestration. Arlington representatives say that such burials typically take place within two weeks of receipt of the bodies of the fallen.

    Science Works for U.S. issued a press release this week, lamenting that sequestration will mean a drastic reduction in the amount of “basic scientific research”:

    George Washington University undergraduate research students April MacIntyre and Hamza Rahimi spoke of their concern that cuts to research would change the career plans of a generation of aspiring young scientists, doctors and engineers.

    Federal research funding provides “resources to educate bright students with a passion to change the world through science,” says Rahimi, a senior.  “Cuts from the sequestration will close off an essential pipeline, limiting the options of students across the country who are just like us, as well as damaging American competitiveness around the world,” he adds.

    NBC reports that air travel will be snarled as budget cuts at the Federal Aviation Administration and Transportation Security Administration will mean longer security lines.

    In a press release earlier this month, the White House Office of Management and Budget claimed that sequestration could lead to outbreaks of foodborne illness as food inspectors are laid off. Likewise, layoffs of workplace safety inspectors could lead to an increase of employee injuries throughout the Nation.

    And just about every mouthpiece representing any facet of America’s vast military-industrial complex has come out saying that sequester will put all Americans in danger.

    What has gone largely unmentioned in all of the sequestration sensationalism is that the Federal government will still spend more money in the year following sequestration than it did before the cuts took place.

    Do you think sequestration is really all that scary?

    Discuss this Story:

    Comment Policy: We encourage open discussion. Comments including racist statements, profanity, name calling or spam will be removed at our discretion. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear it is likely because it violates the policy.

    The Dishonesty Of Assault Weapon Laws
    The GOP’s Era Of No Feelings
    How Redbox Took On Climate Change: Fewer Left-hand Turns
    Scotland Is Still Closer To Independence—Just Look At Quebec
    Relief Over Scotland Gives Way To ‘Great Stagnation’ Worries
    China Says Will Not Alter Policy Because Of One Economic Indicator
    Recovery Eludes Long-term Unemployed
    Nobody’s Neutral In Net Neutrality Debate
    China, U.S., India Push World Carbon Emissions Up
    Falling Used-car Prices Roil The Auto Market
    Gas Prices Fall, Extending Summer Decline
    Top 5 Money Problems Americans Face
    Detroit Fears Of Losing Carmaking To Silicon Valley
    Redefining The ‘Border Crisis’
    India’s Drug War Is Good News
    Richard Clarke’s Hair Is On Fire Again
    Islamic Terrorists Control Our Minds
    Somebody Should Drown Ann Coulter
    The Left Has An ‘Extreme’ Base Of Its Own — And It’s Not Ready For Hillary
    Does It Bother You That Boehner Probably Isn’t Going Anywhere As House Speaker?
    U.K. Scrambles Fighter Jets To Intercept Two Russian Strategic ‘Bear’ Bombers
    Spanish Bond Risk Rises As Catalan Referendum “Dialog” Heats Up
    The Scotland Referendum: Who Voted How And Why?
    Why Global Growth Is So Disappointing
    The Next Crisis: Part 1
    GDIAF NRSC
    Scotland And The End Of Centralization
    Educational Choice Is Good Policy
    Why Switzerland Is Nevada’s Biggest Foreign Trading Partner
    Free Internet Is Becoming A Way To Get People To Buy Phones
    Read more from Economy & Politics...

    Liberty Investor Digest

    Get today's most important
    financial headlines all in
    one place by email!



    Sources


    close[X]

    Sign Up For Liberty Investor Digest™!

    Get Liberty Investor Digest FREE By Email!

    Input your name and email address in the fields below and get today's most important financial headlines sent straight to you inbox!

    Privacy PolicyYou can opt-out at any time. We protect your information like a mother hen. We will not sell or rent your email address to anyone for any reason.