Categories

Economy & Politics

Tools

  • Economy & Politics
  • Investing
  • Personal Finance
  • Related Posts


    Why California Needs Thirsty Alfalfa
    Israel Thanks Obama For Keeping Its Nuclear ‘Secret’
    Russia Is Using Mobile Crematoriums To Hide Ukraine’s Dead
    China’s Growing Meth Addiction
    China’s Pivot To Latin America
    Durable Goods Orders Slide YoY 4th Month In A Row Despite Dramatic Upward Revisions
    Chinese State Paper Warns “War Will Be Inevitable” Unless U.S. Stops Meddling In Territorial Dispute
    Global Trade Dives Most Since The Financial Crisis
    How The Saudis Wag The Washington Dog
    ISIS Planning US Nuclear Attack In Next 12 Months
    What Exactly Is Going On At Lake Mead?
    The Only Hillary Alternative
    The Chinese And U.S. Economies Are Bubble-Thin
    Inequality And A Solution’s Missing Ingredient
    Baby Boomers Invite Millennials To Their Office Party, But Many Don’t Stay Long


    Is Sequestration Really That Scary?

    The political football that is sequestration will be intentionally grounded today as lawmakers on both sides of the field decide how to approach the next play. In the meantime, cheerleaders for and against sequestration are holding pep rallies to fire up the public about what lies ahead — depending on who emerges victorious in the political gamesmanship.

    Many Republicans and independents have argued that if any government spending is going to be cut, it must be done by force; thus, lawmakers should allow the sequester to stand. According to Pew, about 49 percent of respondents to a recent poll said the cuts should be delayed. A surprising 40 percent said sequestration should be carried out. And even an impressive one-third of respondents who described themselves as Democrats favor full-on sequestration.

    Those who have aligned themselves squarely against any sort of sequestration are working overtime to alarm a populace that has been desensitized by story after story of the horrors of looming government cuts that rarely happen.

    Here are some of the more interesting “the sky is falling” sequester headlines:

    Wired reports that sequestration will lead to a backlog of delays in veteran funerals at Arlington National Cemetery:

    There’s currently an average of 31 funerals a day at Arlington, the nation’s most prestigious resting place for war veterans. But the Army expects that under the automatic budget cuts known as sequestration, that average will drop to 24. As first tweeted by CNN’s Barbara Starr, that works out to 160 fewer funerals every month.

    The Army says Arlington’s top priority is to bury troops killed in action in Afghanistan. That is not going to change under sequestration. Arlington representatives say that such burials typically take place within two weeks of receipt of the bodies of the fallen.

    Science Works for U.S. issued a press release this week, lamenting that sequestration will mean a drastic reduction in the amount of “basic scientific research”:

    George Washington University undergraduate research students April MacIntyre and Hamza Rahimi spoke of their concern that cuts to research would change the career plans of a generation of aspiring young scientists, doctors and engineers.

    Federal research funding provides “resources to educate bright students with a passion to change the world through science,” says Rahimi, a senior.  “Cuts from the sequestration will close off an essential pipeline, limiting the options of students across the country who are just like us, as well as damaging American competitiveness around the world,” he adds.

    NBC reports that air travel will be snarled as budget cuts at the Federal Aviation Administration and Transportation Security Administration will mean longer security lines.

    In a press release earlier this month, the White House Office of Management and Budget claimed that sequestration could lead to outbreaks of foodborne illness as food inspectors are laid off. Likewise, layoffs of workplace safety inspectors could lead to an increase of employee injuries throughout the Nation.

    And just about every mouthpiece representing any facet of America’s vast military-industrial complex has come out saying that sequester will put all Americans in danger.

    What has gone largely unmentioned in all of the sequestration sensationalism is that the Federal government will still spend more money in the year following sequestration than it did before the cuts took place.

    Do you think sequestration is really all that scary?

    Discuss this Story:

    Comment Policy: We encourage open discussion. Comments including racist statements, profanity, name calling or spam will be removed at our discretion. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear it is likely because it violates the policy.

    Signs Of Revival In Business Investment Seen In April Durable-goods Report
    Obama Turns To City Halls To Get Around Congress
    Spain Veers Left, And Toward Uncharted Territory, In Elections
    New Database Reveals Pay At America’s Biggest Companies
    Fed’s Fischer: Too Much Weight Placed On Fed’s First Rate Hike
    How ‘Mathiness’ Made Me Jaded About Economics
    U.S. Bets On Egypt While Ignoring Tunisia’s Success
    Hillary Keeps It Boring
    GOP 2016 Candidates Are New And Improved. The GOP Isn’t.
    Fox To Candidates: Go Nuts. On Camera. Please.
    Suicide Bomber Detonates In Saudi Mosque, ISIS Suspected
    George Soros Warns ‘No Exaggeration’ That China-U.S. On ‘Threshold Of World War 3′
    Welcome To The Oligarch Recovery: 82% Of US Construction Is Luxury Units
    US Retaliates At China Escalation, Warns Sea “Sandcastles” May “Lead To Conflict”
    The Fallacy Of Unequivocal Faith In The Fed’s Babbling Bubble-Blowers
    Ron Paul On The Public Debt And The Collapse Of The Dollar
    Another Political News Site, But This One Will Sell You Things
    Bernanke And Yellen Don’t Understand How The Economy Works
    How Will Generation Z Disrupt The Workplace?
    Jobless Claims Rise Slightly Last Week
    Supreme Court 401(k) Ruling Latest Shift In Favor Of Retirement Savers
    China, India Likely To Be Biggest Shareholders In AIIB
    House Panel Issues Subpoena To Fed Over 2012 Information Leak
    Senate Advances Fast-track Trade Bill Sought By Obama
    2016 Might Look Safe To Democrats. But 2024?
    A Backdoor Way To End The Fed
    Israel Fears Obama Will Stop Hiding Its Nuclear ‘Secret’
    Republicans Chase Imaginary Rockefellers
    Chicago Fed Contracts For 4th Month In A Row As Initial Jobless Claims Hover Near 40 Year Lows
    The Fed’s Computer Model Of The U.S. Economy ‘Sees Little Slack’ (And A Big Clue From Gartman)
    Read more from Economy & Politics...

    Liberty Investor Digest

    Get today's most important
    financial headlines all in
    one place by email!



    Sources


    close[X]

    Sign Up For Liberty Investor Digest™!

    Get Liberty Investor Digest FREE By Email!

    Input your name and email address in the fields below and get today's most important financial headlines sent straight to you inbox!

    Privacy PolicyYou can opt-out at any time. We protect your information like a mother hen. We will not sell or rent your email address to anyone for any reason.