Categories

Investing Observation & Opinion

Tools

  • Economy & Politics
  • Investing
  • Personal Finance
  • Related Posts


    7 Brain Biases That Could Affect Your Investing Strategy — And How To Outsmart Them
    This Is How Caterpillar Just Blew Away Q3 Earnings
    Futures Bounce On Stronger Europe Headline PMIs Despite Markit’s Warning Of “Darker Picture” In “Anaemic” Internals
    Russia Is De-dollarizing
    How The NSA Has Turned Into A Giant Profit Center For Corrupt Insiders
    Caterpillar Profit Beats View, Raises Outlook; Shares Gain
    Comcast Reports Higher Quarterly Revenue, Profit
    GM Posts Higher-than-expected Profit On Strong North American Demand
    Stock Futures Inch Up, Indicating Rebound; Earnings Awaited
    Business Activity Improves In China, Euro Zone But Little Sign Of Turnaround
    Honda Executives To Take Pay Cut After Fifth Fit Hybrid Recall
    U.S. Prosecutors Probe Takata Corp Over Statements
    Euro Zone Business Growth Unexpectedly Gains Pace, Prices Still Falling: PMI
    Tesco Scraps Profit Outlook As Accounting Black Hole Deepens
    Chinese Trainmakers Set To Go Head To Head For California Deal


    The Biggest Energy Market Breakthrough Since Hydraulic Fracturing

    Today, I’m zeroing in on the baloney that renewable energy sources promise to put an end to our use of coal in the United States.

    The extreme tree huggers in the bunch — who routinely spit in the face of perfectly logical, economic arguments — insist that we have no choice but to abandon using it. Stat!

    Why? Because coal is dirty. It generates too many darn pollutants. And it threatens to do irreparable harm to the Earth.

    The reality? The situation is hardly that dire. Here’s the proof.

    Just the Facts, Ma’am

    If we look at the hard data, it turns out we’ve actually been rolling back the “carbon clock” for years.

    Last year, carbon dioxide emissions from coal specifically fell to a 26-year low. Total U.S. energy-related carbon dioxide emissions fell to a 20-year low. And if we adjust for population, carbon dioxide emissions per capita nearly hit a 50-year low.

    Voila! We’re right back to the year 1997.

    http://www.wallstreetdaily.com/wallstreet-research/charts/0813_Pollutants.png

    “There is rich irony here,” says The Wall Street Journal’s Matt Ridley. He’s not kidding, either.

    As we all know, reducing emissions remains environmentalists’ raison d’être. And yet, they’re getting what they want, thanks to one of the “technologies [that's] most reliably and stridently opposed by the environmental movement,” as Ridley puts it.

    He’s talking about hydraulic fracturing, of course.

    It’s single-handedly responsible for unleashing the natural gas glut in the United States, which drove down market prices. In turn, utilities couldn’t resist the temptation, economically speaking, to increase their use of natural gas and reduce their use of coal for electricity generation. And voilà!

    Since coal emits about twice as much carbon dioxide as natural gas, emissions were all but guaranteed to decline. And they have done exactly that.

    As I pointed out about a month ago, though, this isn’t a permanent transition. It’s a result of what the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) calls the “elasticity of substitution.”

    In layman’s terms, utilities merely use the most cost-effective power generation source. That means that as market fundamentals move in favor of coal again, they’ll ramp up usage.

    Guess what? That’s starting to happen, based on recent comments from Peabody Energy (BTU) Chairman and CEO Gregory H. Boyce.

    However, that doesn’t mean carbon dioxide emissions are bound to reverse course and increase uncontrollably as coal usage rebounds.

    Based on the research I’ve been doing on various disruptive technologies for MicroCap Tech Trader subscribers, I’m convinced that we’re on the cusp of another technological breakthrough — one that’s relevant to our discussion today.

    Out of fairness to paying subscribers, though, I can’t share all the details.

    Instead, I’ll simply say this: If a particular company’s combustion technology proves to be as effective in increasing efficiency in coal-burning applications as it has already demonstrated in natural gas applications, look out.

    Suddenly, coal won’t be so dirty anymore.

    Yes, I’m saying that the future of coal rests on a technological breakthrough that dramatically reduces pollutants—and, thereby, eliminates the pressure to abandon its use.

    Before you chalk that up to an impossible technological feat and summarily dismiss my argument altogether, realize this.

    The future for renewable energy sources rests even more heavily on our ability to innovate. Not only do we need to come up with a viable storage solution, we also need to dramatically reduce costs.

    As I’ve pointed out before, renewables remain too darn expensive. Even with heavy government subsidies. And the government knows it, too.

    More Double Talk From Washington

    President Barack Obama wants to move on from fossil fuels and coal in particular. He considers them “energy sources of the past.” The only problem? The U.S. Department of Energy is broadcasting a dramatically different plan for the future. (Nothing like the government talking out of both sides of its mouth, huh?)

    Through 2040, the Department of Energy expects fossil fuels to still serve as the dominant energy source at 80.1 percent. As for renewables? Well, their contribution barely makes it into the double digits at 10.8 percent.

    http://www.wallstreetdaily.com/wallstreet-research/charts/0813_Renewables.png

    That’s pathetic, considering that more than $2 trillion has been invested in renewable energy projects over the past 20 years, according to the IEA. Instead of increasing renewables usage, however, those funds led to a decline from 9.3 percent in 1948 to 7.5 percent in 2012. (Can you say “negative return on investment?”)

    Bottom line: I’m monitoring technological developments throughout the energy sector. So far, I haven’t seen a noteworthy innovation that could make renewables dramatically more affordable. But I am seeing compelling developments on the coal front.

    So for right now, renewables don’t stand a chance at snuffing out coal. And if the company I’m tracking makes clean-burning coal a reality, renewables might never stand a chance of dethroning coal. So stayed tuned, as we could be on the brink of the biggest energy breakthrough since hydraulic fracturing.

    I promise to keep you updated on the situation in the months ahead.

    Ahead of the tape,

    — Louis Basenese

    Louis Basenese Co-Founder, Chief Investment Strategist for Wall Street Daily. A former Wall Street consultant and analyst, Louis helped direct over $1 billion in institutional capital before founding Wall Street Daily where he serves as Chief Investment Strategist. In addition to being an expert on technology and small-cap stocks, Louis is also well versed in special situations, including Mergers & Acquisitions and spinoffs.

    | All posts from Louis Basenese

    Discuss this Story:

    Comment Policy: We encourage open discussion. Comments including racist statements, profanity, name calling or spam will be removed at our discretion. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear it is likely because it violates the policy.

    U.S. Stock Options Markets Agree To Need For Trading Halts On Big Moves
    Buffett Copycats Risk A Pounding As Berkshire Portfolio Suffers
    Bond Funds Stock Up On Treasuries In Prep For Market Shock
    Stocks Fall As S&P 500 Breaks 4-day Winning Streak
    Apple Appears Upstoppable: Stock Hits High
    Yelp Shares Dive On Sales Forecast
    AT&T Shares Drop As Earnings Miss Estimates
    Oil Prices Sink To 27-month Lows On Rising Supplies
    Angie’s List Crossed Off By Investors Again
    Is It All About Ebola After All?
    Equity Levitation Stumbles After Second ECB Denial Of Corporate Bond Buying, Report Of 11 Stress Test Failures
    100% Of Mainstream Interest Rate Theory Is Wrong
    VIX Has Never Done This Before… Ever
    The Hedge Fund Industry’s 25 Favorite ETFs
    Fed Inspector General Finds NY Fed Knew Of JPMorgan ‘Whale’ Risks In 2010, “Missed Opportunity”
    Futures Point To Slight Gain After Four-day Rally
    Dow Chemical Profit Beats Estimates As Plastics Margins Rise
    Pimco’s Banking Expert Expects 18 Lenders To Fail ECB Stress Test
    ECB Cools Speculation Over Bank Health Checks Ahead Of Results
    Futures Flat After Four-day Rally, Yahoo Up Early
    Boeing And Chinese Partner To Make Jet Fuel From ‘Gutter Oil’
    15% In Four Days! 5 Stocks Rule The Bounce
    Dow Back In Black For ’14, Nasdaq Up 2.4%
    Yahoo Posts Gains In Sales, Profits But Pressure Still On
    DOT Website Has Snafu On Air Bag Recall Info
    Michigan Requires Dealers For Tesla
    Has Apple Stock Peaked?
    Turner Networks Taken Off Dish Lineup On Contract Row
    Hires Up, Greater Chances Of Raises, 401(k)s
    3 Ways To Avoid Going Off A Stock Market Cliff With The Buy-And-Hold Herd
    Read more from Investing...

    Liberty Investor Digest

    Get today's most important
    financial headlines all in
    one place by email!



    Sources


    close[X]

    Sign Up For Liberty Investor Digest™!

    Get Liberty Investor Digest FREE By Email!

    Input your name and email address in the fields below and get today's most important financial headlines sent straight to you inbox!

    Privacy PolicyYou can opt-out at any time. We protect your information like a mother hen. We will not sell or rent your email address to anyone for any reason.