Categories

Investing Observation & Opinion

Tools

  • Economy & Politics
  • Investing
  • Personal Finance
  • Related Posts


    Who’s Riding Honda’s Motorized Unicycles? Today, It’s Rock Stars—but Tomorrow It Might Be Your Grandma
    “The Most Important Chart For Investors” Flashback, And Why USDJPY 120 Is Now Coming Fast
    Nikkei Futures Halted Limit Up (+1100) As USDJPY Tops 112
    I Pledge Allegiance…
    The Dollar Decline Continues: China Starts Direct Convertibility With Asia’s #1 Financial Hub
    Chevron Profit Jumps As Refining Offsets Production Dip
    Exxon Third-quarter Profit Rises 3 Percent On Refining
    Continental AG CEO Says Audi Recall No Threat To Guidance
    Wal-Mart To Expand Discounts As Retail Price War Heats Up
    Funds With Killer Taxes
    Futures Spurt Higher As Japan Index Leaps 4.8%
    Citigroup’s $600M About-face
    Profits Drive U.S. Stock Rebound As Fear Fades
    Starbucks Cools On Earnings, Outlook
    Former Android Chief Andy Rubin Leaving Google


    The Biggest Energy Market Breakthrough Since Hydraulic Fracturing

    Today, I’m zeroing in on the baloney that renewable energy sources promise to put an end to our use of coal in the United States.

    The extreme tree huggers in the bunch — who routinely spit in the face of perfectly logical, economic arguments — insist that we have no choice but to abandon using it. Stat!

    Why? Because coal is dirty. It generates too many darn pollutants. And it threatens to do irreparable harm to the Earth.

    The reality? The situation is hardly that dire. Here’s the proof.

    Just the Facts, Ma’am

    If we look at the hard data, it turns out we’ve actually been rolling back the “carbon clock” for years.

    Last year, carbon dioxide emissions from coal specifically fell to a 26-year low. Total U.S. energy-related carbon dioxide emissions fell to a 20-year low. And if we adjust for population, carbon dioxide emissions per capita nearly hit a 50-year low.

    Voila! We’re right back to the year 1997.

    http://www.wallstreetdaily.com/wallstreet-research/charts/0813_Pollutants.png

    “There is rich irony here,” says The Wall Street Journal’s Matt Ridley. He’s not kidding, either.

    As we all know, reducing emissions remains environmentalists’ raison d’être. And yet, they’re getting what they want, thanks to one of the “technologies [that's] most reliably and stridently opposed by the environmental movement,” as Ridley puts it.

    He’s talking about hydraulic fracturing, of course.

    It’s single-handedly responsible for unleashing the natural gas glut in the United States, which drove down market prices. In turn, utilities couldn’t resist the temptation, economically speaking, to increase their use of natural gas and reduce their use of coal for electricity generation. And voilà!

    Since coal emits about twice as much carbon dioxide as natural gas, emissions were all but guaranteed to decline. And they have done exactly that.

    As I pointed out about a month ago, though, this isn’t a permanent transition. It’s a result of what the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) calls the “elasticity of substitution.”

    In layman’s terms, utilities merely use the most cost-effective power generation source. That means that as market fundamentals move in favor of coal again, they’ll ramp up usage.

    Guess what? That’s starting to happen, based on recent comments from Peabody Energy (BTU) Chairman and CEO Gregory H. Boyce.

    However, that doesn’t mean carbon dioxide emissions are bound to reverse course and increase uncontrollably as coal usage rebounds.

    Based on the research I’ve been doing on various disruptive technologies for MicroCap Tech Trader subscribers, I’m convinced that we’re on the cusp of another technological breakthrough — one that’s relevant to our discussion today.

    Out of fairness to paying subscribers, though, I can’t share all the details.

    Instead, I’ll simply say this: If a particular company’s combustion technology proves to be as effective in increasing efficiency in coal-burning applications as it has already demonstrated in natural gas applications, look out.

    Suddenly, coal won’t be so dirty anymore.

    Yes, I’m saying that the future of coal rests on a technological breakthrough that dramatically reduces pollutants—and, thereby, eliminates the pressure to abandon its use.

    Before you chalk that up to an impossible technological feat and summarily dismiss my argument altogether, realize this.

    The future for renewable energy sources rests even more heavily on our ability to innovate. Not only do we need to come up with a viable storage solution, we also need to dramatically reduce costs.

    As I’ve pointed out before, renewables remain too darn expensive. Even with heavy government subsidies. And the government knows it, too.

    More Double Talk From Washington

    President Barack Obama wants to move on from fossil fuels and coal in particular. He considers them “energy sources of the past.” The only problem? The U.S. Department of Energy is broadcasting a dramatically different plan for the future. (Nothing like the government talking out of both sides of its mouth, huh?)

    Through 2040, the Department of Energy expects fossil fuels to still serve as the dominant energy source at 80.1 percent. As for renewables? Well, their contribution barely makes it into the double digits at 10.8 percent.

    http://www.wallstreetdaily.com/wallstreet-research/charts/0813_Renewables.png

    That’s pathetic, considering that more than $2 trillion has been invested in renewable energy projects over the past 20 years, according to the IEA. Instead of increasing renewables usage, however, those funds led to a decline from 9.3 percent in 1948 to 7.5 percent in 2012. (Can you say “negative return on investment?”)

    Bottom line: I’m monitoring technological developments throughout the energy sector. So far, I haven’t seen a noteworthy innovation that could make renewables dramatically more affordable. But I am seeing compelling developments on the coal front.

    So for right now, renewables don’t stand a chance at snuffing out coal. And if the company I’m tracking makes clean-burning coal a reality, renewables might never stand a chance of dethroning coal. So stayed tuned, as we could be on the brink of the biggest energy breakthrough since hydraulic fracturing.

    I promise to keep you updated on the situation in the months ahead.

    Ahead of the tape,

    — Louis Basenese

    Louis Basenese Co-Founder, Chief Investment Strategist for Wall Street Daily. A former Wall Street consultant and analyst, Louis helped direct over $1 billion in institutional capital before founding Wall Street Daily where he serves as Chief Investment Strategist. In addition to being an expert on technology and small-cap stocks, Louis is also well versed in special situations, including Mergers & Acquisitions and spinoffs.

    | All posts from Louis Basenese

    Discuss this Story:

    Comment Policy: We encourage open discussion. Comments including racist statements, profanity, name calling or spam will be removed at our discretion. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear it is likely because it violates the policy.

    LinkedIn Offers Languid Revenue Forecast
    New York Times Narrows Loss But Ad Sales Fall
    Silver, Copper Slammed As Commodities Crumble Into US Open
    20-Year CBS News Veteran Details Massive Censorship And Propaganda In Mainstream Media
    Mysterious Chinese Buyer Of Record Crude Oil Cargoes Revealed
    Coca-Cola’s Anti-Religious Positions
    The Bittersweet Trade Policy That Has Kept America’s Sugar Prices High For Decades
    The Court Document That Shows How Tim Cook Does Business
    Futures Point To Lower Open Despite Strong GDP Report
    MasterCard Profit Beats Estimates As Card Usage Rises
    Time Warner Cable Loses More Video Customers In Latest Quarter
    Wal-Mart And Allies In Face-off With Apple Pay Over Mobile Payments
    Dollar Surges As Fed Ends QE On Hawkish Note
    Visa Sees Mobile Payment As Big Growth Driver
    Apple CEO Tim Cook: ‘I’m Proud To Be Gay’
    20 Dividend Stocks Costing You Money
    Street Eyes Economy As Fed Ends QE
    Fed Faces New Hurdles As QE Ends
    Microsoft Watch Beats Apple To Market
    Retirees Sue GE Over Health Coverage
    Microsoft Lays Off 3,000 In Latest Round Of Cuts
    Alibaba Stock Bulls, Bears Load Up Before Earnings
    Chrysler Recalls 503,000 For Two Flaws
    Explosions That Blast Stocks
    First Look: HP Pushes Into 3-D Printing, Blended Reality
    US Taxpayers Pay For SEC To Arrange Early Release Of Data To HFTs
    Flat Futures Foreshadow FOMC Statement Despite Facebook Flameout
    Things That Make You Go Hmmm… Like The Swiss Gold Status Quo Showdown
    Angry Tim Cook Issues Veiled Threat At Retailers Shunning Apple Pay
    Total War Over The Petrodollar
    Read more from Investing...

    Liberty Investor Digest

    Get today's most important
    financial headlines all in
    one place by email!



    Sources


    close[X]

    Sign Up For Liberty Investor Digest™!

    Get Liberty Investor Digest FREE By Email!

    Input your name and email address in the fields below and get today's most important financial headlines sent straight to you inbox!

    Privacy PolicyYou can opt-out at any time. We protect your information like a mother hen. We will not sell or rent your email address to anyone for any reason.