Categories

Investing Observation & Opinion

Tools

  • Economy & Politics
  • Investing
  • Personal Finance
  • Related Posts


    Dollar Tree To Buy Family Dollar For $8.5 Billion
    Trendy Chipotle Burritos Show How Pricing Power Belongs To The Hip
    “Reprehensible” Lloyds Bank Agrees To $105 Million Wristslap For Manipulating Libor
    Near-Record Trulia Shorts Crushed After Zillow Acquires Incomeless Company For $3.5 Billion
    US Equities Flat While China Surges On More Stimulus And Bailout Hopes
    Like Dripping Silver Icicles
    ‘London Fix’ Gold Rigging By Bullion Bank Exposed In Class Action Lawsuit: The Complete Charts
    It Is Mostly About The US Next Week
    If You Want To Be Rich And Powerful, Majoring In STEM Is A Good Place To Start
    The Threat Of Rising Rates
    Europe Nervy As Russian Assets Hit By New Sanctions Talk
    Tyson To Sell Mexican, Brazilian Poultry Businesses To JBS
    Hague Court Orders Russia To Pay Over $50 Billion In Yukos Case
    Futures Flat With S&P 500 Near Record Levels
    Microsoft Says Government Officials Make Sudden Visits To China Offices


    The Biggest Energy Market Breakthrough Since Hydraulic Fracturing

    Today, I’m zeroing in on the baloney that renewable energy sources promise to put an end to our use of coal in the United States.

    The extreme tree huggers in the bunch — who routinely spit in the face of perfectly logical, economic arguments — insist that we have no choice but to abandon using it. Stat!

    Why? Because coal is dirty. It generates too many darn pollutants. And it threatens to do irreparable harm to the Earth.

    The reality? The situation is hardly that dire. Here’s the proof.

    Just the Facts, Ma’am

    If we look at the hard data, it turns out we’ve actually been rolling back the “carbon clock” for years.

    Last year, carbon dioxide emissions from coal specifically fell to a 26-year low. Total U.S. energy-related carbon dioxide emissions fell to a 20-year low. And if we adjust for population, carbon dioxide emissions per capita nearly hit a 50-year low.

    Voila! We’re right back to the year 1997.

    http://www.wallstreetdaily.com/wallstreet-research/charts/0813_Pollutants.png

    “There is rich irony here,” says The Wall Street Journal’s Matt Ridley. He’s not kidding, either.

    As we all know, reducing emissions remains environmentalists’ raison d’être. And yet, they’re getting what they want, thanks to one of the “technologies [that's] most reliably and stridently opposed by the environmental movement,” as Ridley puts it.

    He’s talking about hydraulic fracturing, of course.

    It’s single-handedly responsible for unleashing the natural gas glut in the United States, which drove down market prices. In turn, utilities couldn’t resist the temptation, economically speaking, to increase their use of natural gas and reduce their use of coal for electricity generation. And voilà!

    Since coal emits about twice as much carbon dioxide as natural gas, emissions were all but guaranteed to decline. And they have done exactly that.

    As I pointed out about a month ago, though, this isn’t a permanent transition. It’s a result of what the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) calls the “elasticity of substitution.”

    In layman’s terms, utilities merely use the most cost-effective power generation source. That means that as market fundamentals move in favor of coal again, they’ll ramp up usage.

    Guess what? That’s starting to happen, based on recent comments from Peabody Energy (BTU) Chairman and CEO Gregory H. Boyce.

    However, that doesn’t mean carbon dioxide emissions are bound to reverse course and increase uncontrollably as coal usage rebounds.

    Based on the research I’ve been doing on various disruptive technologies for MicroCap Tech Trader subscribers, I’m convinced that we’re on the cusp of another technological breakthrough — one that’s relevant to our discussion today.

    Out of fairness to paying subscribers, though, I can’t share all the details.

    Instead, I’ll simply say this: If a particular company’s combustion technology proves to be as effective in increasing efficiency in coal-burning applications as it has already demonstrated in natural gas applications, look out.

    Suddenly, coal won’t be so dirty anymore.

    Yes, I’m saying that the future of coal rests on a technological breakthrough that dramatically reduces pollutants—and, thereby, eliminates the pressure to abandon its use.

    Before you chalk that up to an impossible technological feat and summarily dismiss my argument altogether, realize this.

    The future for renewable energy sources rests even more heavily on our ability to innovate. Not only do we need to come up with a viable storage solution, we also need to dramatically reduce costs.

    As I’ve pointed out before, renewables remain too darn expensive. Even with heavy government subsidies. And the government knows it, too.

    More Double Talk From Washington

    President Barack Obama wants to move on from fossil fuels and coal in particular. He considers them “energy sources of the past.” The only problem? The U.S. Department of Energy is broadcasting a dramatically different plan for the future. (Nothing like the government talking out of both sides of its mouth, huh?)

    Through 2040, the Department of Energy expects fossil fuels to still serve as the dominant energy source at 80.1 percent. As for renewables? Well, their contribution barely makes it into the double digits at 10.8 percent.

    http://www.wallstreetdaily.com/wallstreet-research/charts/0813_Renewables.png

    That’s pathetic, considering that more than $2 trillion has been invested in renewable energy projects over the past 20 years, according to the IEA. Instead of increasing renewables usage, however, those funds led to a decline from 9.3 percent in 1948 to 7.5 percent in 2012. (Can you say “negative return on investment?”)

    Bottom line: I’m monitoring technological developments throughout the energy sector. So far, I haven’t seen a noteworthy innovation that could make renewables dramatically more affordable. But I am seeing compelling developments on the coal front.

    So for right now, renewables don’t stand a chance at snuffing out coal. And if the company I’m tracking makes clean-burning coal a reality, renewables might never stand a chance of dethroning coal. So stayed tuned, as we could be on the brink of the biggest energy breakthrough since hydraulic fracturing.

    I promise to keep you updated on the situation in the months ahead.

    Ahead of the tape,

    — Louis Basenese

    Louis Basenese Co-Founder, Chief Investment Strategist for Wall Street Daily. A former Wall Street consultant and analyst, Louis helped direct over $1 billion in institutional capital before founding Wall Street Daily where he serves as Chief Investment Strategist. In addition to being an expert on technology and small-cap stocks, Louis is also well versed in special situations, including Mergers & Acquisitions and spinoffs.

    | All posts from Louis Basenese

    Discuss this Story:

    Comment Policy: We encourage open discussion. Comments including racist statements, profanity, name calling or spam will be removed at our discretion. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear it is likely because it violates the policy.

    Pfizer’s Need For Deal Looms Larger With Earnings Report
    China Condemns U.S. Anti-dumping Duties On Solar Imports
    JD.com To Sell Microsoft’s Xbox One Games Console In China
    Scandal-hit China Food Firm Withdrawing All Products, U.S. Parent Says
    Russia To Ban Several McDonalds Burgers Including Royal And Filet-O-Fish
    Starbucks Sales In Americas Region Up Slightly More Than Expected
    Futures Dragged Down By Visa, Amazon Despite USDJPY Levitation
    CEO Of Russia’s 2nd Largest Gold Producer Is ‘Horrified’ At Market Manipulation
    Creation Of S&P 500 ETFs Rises To All Time High
    Barclays Thinks Its Dark Pool Is Fine
    Are You A .Ninja Or A .Guru?
    GM Recalls Far From Calamity For Some Dealers Who Find New Customers, Business
    Stock Futures Dip On Weak Results; Durable Goods Data Due
    Russian Consumer Watchdog Seeks Ban On Some McDonalds’ Products
    Euro, Shares Sag As Ukraine Woes Hit German Confidence
    In China Meat Scandal, McDonald’s Japan Switches To Thai Chicken, No Nuggets In Hong Kong
    Shares In Britain’s RBS Soar After Surprise Profit
    Vodafone Revenue Dragged Lower By Spain And South Africa In First Quarter
    PetroChina Reconsiders Sale Of Natural Gas Pipeline Assets
    Sluggish Latin American Results Show Risks For U.S. Companies
    Amazon’s Heavy Investing Eats Into Bottom Line, Shares Drop
    China Meat Supplier Faced Claims Last Year Over Unethical Work Practices
    U.S. Judge Says She Is Troubled By Apple $450 Million E-books Deal
    BNP Paribas To Pay $80 Million For Defrauding U.S. Agriculture Department
    Nucor Confident Of Favorable Rulings Vs Steel Import ‘Tsunami’
    How To Tell If Your 401(k) Stinks
    Boeing Reaches Plane Parts Deal With Iran
    Legal Tender Renders Planning Impossible
    It’s Time For The BRICS To Counter U.S. Destabilization Efforts
    Goldman Goes Schizo On Gold: Boosts Price Target To $1200 Even As It Is “Selling It With Conviction”
    Read more from Investing...

    Liberty Investor Digest

    Get today's most important
    financial headlines all in
    one place by email!



    Sources


    close[X]

    Sign Up For Liberty Investor Digest™!

    Get Liberty Investor Digest FREE By Email!

    Input your name and email address in the fields below and get today's most important financial headlines sent straight to you inbox!

    Privacy PolicyYou can opt-out at any time. We protect your information like a mother hen. We will not sell or rent your email address to anyone for any reason.