Categories

Investing

Tools

  • Economy & Politics
  • Investing
  • Personal Finance
  • Related Posts


    Largest Share Of Americans View ‘Race Relations’ As Nation’s Top Problem Since L.A. Riots
    WTI Crude Plunges Back Below $56, Nasdaq Red On Gilead Weakness
    Treasury Surge Set To Continue: Hedge Funds Most Short The 10-Year In Three Years
    U.S. Equities Set For Record Open On Crude Commentary, Stable Russian Ruble
    Meet Joe Lewis – The $200 Million “British Madoff”
    Maybe Oil Goes To $70 On Its Way To $40
    Seven Biggest Business Blunders Ever Committed
    12 Stocks Making Investors A Fortune!
    Staples Says Breach Affects 1.2M Cards
    Probe Seeks Data From Panama Firm
    Elon Musk’s ‘Hyperloop’ Idea Takes Next Step
    America’s Fastest-growing Beer Brands
    Oil Falls Towards $61 On Supply Outlook
    Futures Climb After Three-day Run
    UK To Extend Libor Manipulation Laws To Cover Gold, Oil, Silver


    The Right Way to View ‘Annualized Gain’ Claims

    Who wouldn’t like to claim a 423,181 percent return in one day?

    Earlier this year, one of my analysts logged a trade with an annualized gain of 423,181 percent. (That’s not a typo.)

    Of course, he’s no billionaire just because of that trade.

    But his trade raises a question people often have about “annualized gains.”

    I frequently get questions on how people should view annualized returns. They can be badly misused and badly misunderstood. So why would an investor even care about them? I’ll explain below why you should care about them.

    In simplest terms, annualized return calculates what would happen if you repeated a trade’s success over the course of a year. If you close a trade for a 10 percent gain over six months, you have a 20 percent annualized gain. The trading year is made up of two six-month periods. And two times a 10 percent nominal return equals a 20 percent annualized return.

    This math makes sense. It lets us compare the success of various trades over various time frames. For example, if you make 50 percent on a trade in just two months, it’s better than making the same gain in two years.

    But extreme “annualized return” examples can create absurd numbers and expectations.

    Take a trader who buys a stock and sells it the next day for a 1 percent gain. That expert can claim an annualized gain of 252 percent. (The convention is to assume there are 252 trading days each year.)

    And if you factor in the effect of compounding gains, the numbers get even bigger. Compounding returns refers to when one day’s gains are reinvested the next day, increasing the value of each subsequent day’s gain. If you calculate compounding returns, the trader can claim an annualized return of 1,127 percent.

    A similar distortion resulted in my analyst’s eye-popping return: He recently closed a trade for a 114.29 percent gain in 23 days. Accounting for compounding returns, he can legitimately claim a six-figure annualized rate of return.

    I think you can quickly tell this is unrealistic and probably impossible. Annualized gains may look good. But they don’t put any money in your pocket. You can’t buy anything with them.

    Also remember, since you can’t lose more than 100 percent on most investments, a 1 percent loss in a single day comes out to an annualized loss of 92 percent. (If you shave 1 percent off the value of something every day, you’ll never reach zero. You simply end up cutting smaller and smaller pieces off a smaller and smaller pie.)

    Compare that with the annualized gain of 1,127 percent, and you can see how adding up a bunch of annualized gains can quickly distort the truth.

    If that’s the case, why use “annualized gains” at all?

    Because annualized returns are a key tool for comparing the returns of investments with different timeframes.

    Suppose I offer you the choice of two investments.

    Investment A will return 4 percent in three months. Investment B will return 7 percent in five months. It’s clear that Investment B offers a higher return, but it will take longer to get it.

    This is where using annualized gains can help. Investment A has an annualized return of 16.99 percent. Investment B has an annualized return of 17.63 percent. Investment B still offers the better return.

    So what are the rules to annualized gains?

    First, don’t take them as gospel if someone is trying to convince you of an investment or trading strategy. Second, the shorter the time period, the less useful annualized gains get. (Think about the one-day trade example.)

    Again, to calculate your own annualized gains, you just need to do a little bit of simple math. Start with how long the trade will last (or lasted). Then, figure out how many of those time periods fit in a year. Finally, multiply the result by the gains.

    So let’s say you have a trade that will close in three months. There are four three-month periods in a year. If the trade returns 10 percent, your annualized return is 40 percent (four times 10 percent).

    Of course, as the saying goes, you can’t “eat” annualized returns. And you should always be skeptical if an annualized gain sounds outlandish.

    But don’t dismiss them entirely. They’re a handy tool for comparing different trades.

    Here’s to our health, wealth and a great retirement,

    — Dr. David Eifrig

    This article originally ran on Wednesday, Aug. 14, at DailyWealth.com.

    Dr. David Eifrig Jr. is the editor of two of Stansberry's best advisory services. One of his advisories, Retirement Millionaire, is a monthly letter showing readers how to live a millionaire lifestyle on less than you'd imagine possible. He travels around the U.S. looking for bargains, deals and great investment ideas. Already his average reader has saved $2,793 since 2008 (documented in each Retirement Millionaire issue). He also writes Retirement Trader, a bi-monthly advisory that explains simple techniques to make large, but very safe, gains in the stock and bond markets. This is a pure finance play and the reason Porter Stansberry loves having "Doc" on the team. Doc holds an MBA from Kellogg and has worked in arbitrage and trading groups with major Wall Street investment banks (Goldman Sachs). In 1995, he retired from the "Street," went to UNC-Chapel Hill for medical school and became an ophthalmologist. Now, in his latest "retirement," he joined Stansberry & Associates full-time to share with readers his experiences and ideas.

    | All posts from Dr. David Eifrig Jr.

    Discuss this Story:

    Comment Policy: We encourage open discussion. Comments including racist statements, profanity, name calling or spam will be removed at our discretion. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear it is likely because it violates the policy.

    Airbus Delivers First A350, Rules Out Cancelling A380 Project
    Air China Signs Deal To Purchase 60 Boeing B737 Aircraft
    UK Watchdog To Probe PwC Over Tesco Accounting Scandal
    Uber Business Model Faces Legal Scrutiny In Taiwan, Chinese Mega City
    Global Shares, Oil And Ruble Rally Into Christmas Period
    Saudi Arabia Says Won’t Cut Oil Output
    Mexico Competition Watchdog Signs Off On AT&T’s Iusacell Buy
    Wall Street Got This One Sector Wrong
    Obama’s Cuba Gambit Will Fail
    ‘Fed To The Rescue’ — The Plunge Protection Team Makes The Front Page
    Nigeria, Belarus Halt All FX Trading As Central Bank Urges “Don’t Panic”
    Russia Reports It Bought Another 600,000 Ounces Of Gold Taking Its Holdings To New Highs
    LendingClub And Billion-Dollar Valuations Are Just The Beginning For Online Lending
    The Indicator That Makes Alibaba Shares A ‘Screaming Buy’
    The Only Social Media Play I’m Recommending Right Now
    Bitcoin Forecast 2015: Four Powerful Trends Will Deliver A Pivotal Year
    Stock Futures Up: Good Vibrations Continue
    Icahn Gives Taj Mahal Casino $20M To Stay Open
    Wanted More Alibaba? Now’s Your Chance
    Nike Profit Up But Shares Drop On Soft Orders
    Stocks Most Overvalued In 45 Years
    Five Reasons Why The Dow Is Skyrocketing
    Hackers Push Stores To Get Breach Insurance
    Bubble 2.0? Craziest IPO Market Since 2000
    BlackBerry Reports Adjusted Profit, But Revenue Disappoints
    Stock Futures Climb After Two-day Rally
    Oil Rallies To $60, Heads For 4th Weekly Fall On Glut
    Alstom Shareholders Back 12.35 Billion Euro Sale Of Power Arm To GE
    Rouble Gains As Officials Step Up Verbal Support
    Thai Union Frozen To Buy U.S. Tuna Firm Bumble Bee For $1.5 Billion
    Read more from Investing...

    Liberty Investor Digest

    Get today's most important
    financial headlines all in
    one place by email!



    Sources


    close[X]

    Sign Up For Liberty Investor Digest™!

    Get Liberty Investor Digest FREE By Email!

    Input your name and email address in the fields below and get today's most important financial headlines sent straight to you inbox!

    Privacy PolicyYou can opt-out at any time. We protect your information like a mother hen. We will not sell or rent your email address to anyone for any reason.