Categories

Investing

Tools

  • Economy & Politics
  • Investing
  • Personal Finance
  • Related Posts


    Tougher Rules Can’t Repair Banking’s Broken Culture
    Macy’s Is Taking On Amazon With Same-day Delivery In 17 Cities
    Here’s What Google’s Secret Car Company Is Called
    These Are The Winners & Losers In Obama’s Plan To Slash Carbon From Power Plants
    Gold Futures Look To Get Off The Mat
    The Tell: Apple’s Stock Drops Below 2 Bearish Technical Thresholds
    Investors Are ‘Stock Market Socialists’
    Silicon Valley’s Favorite Meal-replacement Drink, Soylent, Is Now Bottled And Made Of Algae
    Pimco Says SEC Probing Its Total Return Exchange-traded Fund
    Skyfall! Apple’s Stock Breaks Three Key Levels
    Former Bank Trader Convicted In Libor Scandal
    Will Siri Voicemail Transcription Revive Apple’s Shares?
    The Hidden Danger In The Most Popular 401(k) Fund: Correction
    China Stock Exchanges Step Up Crackdown On Short-selling
    Shire Goes Public With Proposed $30 Billion Baxalta Tie-up


    The Right Way to View ‘Annualized Gain’ Claims

    Who wouldn’t like to claim a 423,181 percent return in one day?

    Earlier this year, one of my analysts logged a trade with an annualized gain of 423,181 percent. (That’s not a typo.)

    Of course, he’s no billionaire just because of that trade.

    But his trade raises a question people often have about “annualized gains.”

    I frequently get questions on how people should view annualized returns. They can be badly misused and badly misunderstood. So why would an investor even care about them? I’ll explain below why you should care about them.

    In simplest terms, annualized return calculates what would happen if you repeated a trade’s success over the course of a year. If you close a trade for a 10 percent gain over six months, you have a 20 percent annualized gain. The trading year is made up of two six-month periods. And two times a 10 percent nominal return equals a 20 percent annualized return.

    This math makes sense. It lets us compare the success of various trades over various time frames. For example, if you make 50 percent on a trade in just two months, it’s better than making the same gain in two years.

    But extreme “annualized return” examples can create absurd numbers and expectations.

    Take a trader who buys a stock and sells it the next day for a 1 percent gain. That expert can claim an annualized gain of 252 percent. (The convention is to assume there are 252 trading days each year.)

    And if you factor in the effect of compounding gains, the numbers get even bigger. Compounding returns refers to when one day’s gains are reinvested the next day, increasing the value of each subsequent day’s gain. If you calculate compounding returns, the trader can claim an annualized return of 1,127 percent.

    A similar distortion resulted in my analyst’s eye-popping return: He recently closed a trade for a 114.29 percent gain in 23 days. Accounting for compounding returns, he can legitimately claim a six-figure annualized rate of return.

    I think you can quickly tell this is unrealistic and probably impossible. Annualized gains may look good. But they don’t put any money in your pocket. You can’t buy anything with them.

    Also remember, since you can’t lose more than 100 percent on most investments, a 1 percent loss in a single day comes out to an annualized loss of 92 percent. (If you shave 1 percent off the value of something every day, you’ll never reach zero. You simply end up cutting smaller and smaller pieces off a smaller and smaller pie.)

    Compare that with the annualized gain of 1,127 percent, and you can see how adding up a bunch of annualized gains can quickly distort the truth.

    If that’s the case, why use “annualized gains” at all?

    Because annualized returns are a key tool for comparing the returns of investments with different timeframes.

    Suppose I offer you the choice of two investments.

    Investment A will return 4 percent in three months. Investment B will return 7 percent in five months. It’s clear that Investment B offers a higher return, but it will take longer to get it.

    This is where using annualized gains can help. Investment A has an annualized return of 16.99 percent. Investment B has an annualized return of 17.63 percent. Investment B still offers the better return.

    So what are the rules to annualized gains?

    First, don’t take them as gospel if someone is trying to convince you of an investment or trading strategy. Second, the shorter the time period, the less useful annualized gains get. (Think about the one-day trade example.)

    Again, to calculate your own annualized gains, you just need to do a little bit of simple math. Start with how long the trade will last (or lasted). Then, figure out how many of those time periods fit in a year. Finally, multiply the result by the gains.

    So let’s say you have a trade that will close in three months. There are four three-month periods in a year. If the trade returns 10 percent, your annualized return is 40 percent (four times 10 percent).

    Of course, as the saying goes, you can’t “eat” annualized returns. And you should always be skeptical if an annualized gain sounds outlandish.

    But don’t dismiss them entirely. They’re a handy tool for comparing different trades.

    Here’s to our health, wealth and a great retirement,

    — Dr. David Eifrig

    This article originally ran on Wednesday, Aug. 14, at DailyWealth.com.

    Dr. David Eifrig Jr. is the editor of two of Stansberry's best advisory services. One of his advisories, Retirement Millionaire, is a monthly letter showing readers how to live a millionaire lifestyle on less than you'd imagine possible. He travels around the U.S. looking for bargains, deals and great investment ideas. Already his average reader has saved $2,793 since 2008 (documented in each Retirement Millionaire issue). He also writes Retirement Trader, a bi-monthly advisory that explains simple techniques to make large, but very safe, gains in the stock and bond markets. This is a pure finance play and the reason Porter Stansberry loves having "Doc" on the team. Doc holds an MBA from Kellogg and has worked in arbitrage and trading groups with major Wall Street investment banks (Goldman Sachs). In 1995, he retired from the "Street," went to UNC-Chapel Hill for medical school and became an ophthalmologist. Now, in his latest "retirement," he joined Stansberry & Associates full-time to share with readers his experiences and ideas.

    | All posts from Dr. David Eifrig Jr.

    Discuss this Story:

    Comment Policy: We encourage open discussion. Comments including racist statements, profanity, name calling or spam will be removed at our discretion. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear it is likely because it violates the policy.

    Alibaba Hires Former Goldman Banker Evans As President
    Stock Futures Lower As Investors Await Earnings, Data
    Aetna Profit Beats As Government Plans Expand
    Brazil Presents Another Hurdle In Monsanto’s Bid For Syngenta
    U.S. DoJ Probes Deutsche Trades Worth Billions
    As Oil Falls Below $50, Analysts Eye ‘Mid-price’ Era
    Another One Bites The Coal Dust – Alpha Natural Files For Bankruptcy
    WTI Crude Crashes To $45 Handle — Lowest Since March
    Citadel Barred From Trading In China After Regulator Accuses “Automated Trading” Unit Of Manipulation
    The Tide Has Turned And These Charts Predict The Next Stop
    What America Would Be Like Without The Federal Reserve
    Why Goldcorp Is A Buy Today
    Buy This Small-Cap ETF For Market-Beating Gains In 2015
    Here’s What Will Fuel The Commodity Prices Rebound
    Fat CEO Pay And Stock Buybacks Threaten Your Portfolio
    Gold Dips As Metal Searches For An August Spark
    Oil Majors, U.S. Dollar Point To Lower Prices
    Jinko Solar’s Triple Play – Value, Growth, And Profitability
    DuPont CEO Ellen Kullman Fails To Deliver On Promises
    Opening Salvo From AT&T And DirecTV: $200 Monthly Promo
    Long, Hot Summer Could Persist On Wall Street
    Buffett, Musk To Spark A Lithium Boom
    Meet The Most Successful NRI Businessman You’ve Probably Never Heard Of
    Immigration Judges Are Burning Out Faster Than Prison Wardens And Hospital Doctors
    What Is An Artificial Ingredient, Anyway?
    Fiat Chrysler Recalls 332,000 Dodge Chargers Due To Air Bag Issue
    Tyson Foods Warns Full-year Profit May Fall Short Of Forecast
    U.S. Stock Futures Little Changed Ahead Of Raft Of Data
    German Carmakers Buy Nokia Maps To Fend Off Digital Rivals
    Western Companies Look Hard At China As Growth Slows
    Read more from Investing...

    Liberty Investor Digest

    Get today's most important
    financial headlines all in
    one place by email!



    Sources


    close[X]

    Sign Up For Liberty Investor Digest™!

    Get Liberty Investor Digest FREE By Email!

    Input your name and email address in the fields below and get today's most important financial headlines sent straight to you inbox!

    Privacy PolicyYou can opt-out at any time. We protect your information like a mother hen. We will not sell or rent your email address to anyone for any reason.