Categories

Investing

Tools

  • Economy & Politics
  • Investing
  • Personal Finance
  • Related Posts


    GOLD: Will This Summer’s Rally Mark A Cyclical Turning Point?
    The “Smartest Money” Is Liquidating Stocks At A Record Pace: “Selling Everything That’s Not Bolted Down”
    Whole Foods Apologizes For Overcharging Customers
    Donald Trump’s Three Biggest Leadership Mistakes
    Is Xiaomi Running Out Of Steam?
    How Hewlett-Packard Plans To Split In Two
    There’s A Ticking Time Bomb Inside The Online Advertising Market
    Seven Alluring Stocks Tempt Investors Into Peril
    Insurance Acquisition: Centene Buying Health Net
    Apple Watch Sales Lagging
    Four Things Investors Should Know For July
    Teladoc Shares Surge 50% In Healthy IPO Debut
    Nike And Neymar Might Have Just Shown Us The Future Of Virtual Reality
    An American Giant Robot Just Challenged A Japanese Giant Robot To A Duel
    PayPal To Buy Digital Money Transfer Provider Xoom


    The Right Way to View ‘Annualized Gain’ Claims

    Who wouldn’t like to claim a 423,181 percent return in one day?

    Earlier this year, one of my analysts logged a trade with an annualized gain of 423,181 percent. (That’s not a typo.)

    Of course, he’s no billionaire just because of that trade.

    But his trade raises a question people often have about “annualized gains.”

    I frequently get questions on how people should view annualized returns. They can be badly misused and badly misunderstood. So why would an investor even care about them? I’ll explain below why you should care about them.

    In simplest terms, annualized return calculates what would happen if you repeated a trade’s success over the course of a year. If you close a trade for a 10 percent gain over six months, you have a 20 percent annualized gain. The trading year is made up of two six-month periods. And two times a 10 percent nominal return equals a 20 percent annualized return.

    This math makes sense. It lets us compare the success of various trades over various time frames. For example, if you make 50 percent on a trade in just two months, it’s better than making the same gain in two years.

    But extreme “annualized return” examples can create absurd numbers and expectations.

    Take a trader who buys a stock and sells it the next day for a 1 percent gain. That expert can claim an annualized gain of 252 percent. (The convention is to assume there are 252 trading days each year.)

    And if you factor in the effect of compounding gains, the numbers get even bigger. Compounding returns refers to when one day’s gains are reinvested the next day, increasing the value of each subsequent day’s gain. If you calculate compounding returns, the trader can claim an annualized return of 1,127 percent.

    A similar distortion resulted in my analyst’s eye-popping return: He recently closed a trade for a 114.29 percent gain in 23 days. Accounting for compounding returns, he can legitimately claim a six-figure annualized rate of return.

    I think you can quickly tell this is unrealistic and probably impossible. Annualized gains may look good. But they don’t put any money in your pocket. You can’t buy anything with them.

    Also remember, since you can’t lose more than 100 percent on most investments, a 1 percent loss in a single day comes out to an annualized loss of 92 percent. (If you shave 1 percent off the value of something every day, you’ll never reach zero. You simply end up cutting smaller and smaller pieces off a smaller and smaller pie.)

    Compare that with the annualized gain of 1,127 percent, and you can see how adding up a bunch of annualized gains can quickly distort the truth.

    If that’s the case, why use “annualized gains” at all?

    Because annualized returns are a key tool for comparing the returns of investments with different timeframes.

    Suppose I offer you the choice of two investments.

    Investment A will return 4 percent in three months. Investment B will return 7 percent in five months. It’s clear that Investment B offers a higher return, but it will take longer to get it.

    This is where using annualized gains can help. Investment A has an annualized return of 16.99 percent. Investment B has an annualized return of 17.63 percent. Investment B still offers the better return.

    So what are the rules to annualized gains?

    First, don’t take them as gospel if someone is trying to convince you of an investment or trading strategy. Second, the shorter the time period, the less useful annualized gains get. (Think about the one-day trade example.)

    Again, to calculate your own annualized gains, you just need to do a little bit of simple math. Start with how long the trade will last (or lasted). Then, figure out how many of those time periods fit in a year. Finally, multiply the result by the gains.

    So let’s say you have a trade that will close in three months. There are four three-month periods in a year. If the trade returns 10 percent, your annualized return is 40 percent (four times 10 percent).

    Of course, as the saying goes, you can’t “eat” annualized returns. And you should always be skeptical if an annualized gain sounds outlandish.

    But don’t dismiss them entirely. They’re a handy tool for comparing different trades.

    Here’s to our health, wealth and a great retirement,

    — Dr. David Eifrig

    This article originally ran on Wednesday, Aug. 14, at DailyWealth.com.

    Dr. David Eifrig Jr. is the editor of two of Stansberry's best advisory services. One of his advisories, Retirement Millionaire, is a monthly letter showing readers how to live a millionaire lifestyle on less than you'd imagine possible. He travels around the U.S. looking for bargains, deals and great investment ideas. Already his average reader has saved $2,793 since 2008 (documented in each Retirement Millionaire issue). He also writes Retirement Trader, a bi-monthly advisory that explains simple techniques to make large, but very safe, gains in the stock and bond markets. This is a pure finance play and the reason Porter Stansberry loves having "Doc" on the team. Doc holds an MBA from Kellogg and has worked in arbitrage and trading groups with major Wall Street investment banks (Goldman Sachs). In 1995, he retired from the "Street," went to UNC-Chapel Hill for medical school and became an ophthalmologist. Now, in his latest "retirement," he joined Stansberry & Associates full-time to share with readers his experiences and ideas.

    | All posts from Dr. David Eifrig Jr.

    Discuss this Story:

    Comment Policy: We encourage open discussion. Comments including racist statements, profanity, name calling or spam will be removed at our discretion. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear it is likely because it violates the policy.

    U.S. Futures Rise Ahead Of Jobs Data
    Dixons Carphone In Deal With Sprint To Open U.S. Stores
    Dollar Firms Before Payrolls, Greece Unease Simmers
    Chinese Stocks Tumble Again, Ignoring Beijing’s Blandishments
    ArcelorMittal Mexico Unit To Slash 2,800 Jobs
    Macy’s Cuts Ties With Trump, New York City Reviews Contracts
    U.S. Probing Whether Airlines Collude To Keep Airfares High
    Former U.S. Agent Pleads Guilty To Bitcoin Theft In Silk Road Probe
    U.S. Sues To Stop Electrolux Acquiring GE’s Appliance Business
    Why Elon Musk Is Donating Millions To Make Artificial Intelligence Safer
    Obama Trade Bill Would Boost Biotech Patents, Leak Suggests
    Gold Shrugs Off Armageddon
    Sony’s Hubris Causes Stock Market Bloodbath
    SpaceX Won’t Give Up
    France Is Right To Mistrust Uber
    Gold Dips As Greek Hopes, Upbeat ADP Report Weigh
    SEC Still At A Loss Over How To Fix ‘Broken Market’
    Constellation Brands Profit Buoyed By Beer Sales
    Dollar Rally Set To Resume In 2nd Half Of 2015
    This Will Make Small-Cap Investors Look Very Smart
    The Real Bitcoin Price-Greek Debt Crisis Connection
    What Is A Leap Second And Why Does It Matter To The Stock Market?
    What Is Google Fiber?
    What Wall Street Doesn’t Get About Plug Power… Yet
    ACE To Acquire Chubb In $28.3 Billion Deal
    Five ‘Firecracker Stocks’ Light It Up In July
    Puerto Rico Crisis: Funds With Most To Lose
    Apple Busted For Price Fixing, Fined $450M
    Nike Co-founder To Step Down As Chairman
    Dow Rises, Ends Q2 1.1% In The Red For 2015
    Read more from Investing...

    Liberty Investor Digest

    Get today's most important
    financial headlines all in
    one place by email!



    Sources


    close[X]

    Sign Up For Liberty Investor Digest™!

    Get Liberty Investor Digest FREE By Email!

    Input your name and email address in the fields below and get today's most important financial headlines sent straight to you inbox!

    Privacy PolicyYou can opt-out at any time. We protect your information like a mother hen. We will not sell or rent your email address to anyone for any reason.