Categories

Investing

Tools

  • Economy & Politics
  • Investing
  • Personal Finance
  • Related Posts


    Is It All About Ebola After All?
    Equity Levitation Stumbles After Second ECB Denial Of Corporate Bond Buying, Report Of 11 Stress Test Failures
    100% Of Mainstream Interest Rate Theory Is Wrong
    VIX Has Never Done This Before… Ever
    The Hedge Fund Industry’s 25 Favorite ETFs
    Fed Inspector General Finds NY Fed Knew Of JPMorgan ‘Whale’ Risks In 2010, “Missed Opportunity”
    Futures Point To Slight Gain After Four-day Rally
    Dow Chemical Profit Beats Estimates As Plastics Margins Rise
    Pimco’s Banking Expert Expects 18 Lenders To Fail ECB Stress Test
    ECB Cools Speculation Over Bank Health Checks Ahead Of Results
    Futures Flat After Four-day Rally, Yahoo Up Early
    Boeing And Chinese Partner To Make Jet Fuel From ‘Gutter Oil’
    15% In Four Days! 5 Stocks Rule The Bounce
    Dow Back In Black For ’14, Nasdaq Up 2.4%
    Yahoo Posts Gains In Sales, Profits But Pressure Still On


    The Right Way to View ‘Annualized Gain’ Claims

    Who wouldn’t like to claim a 423,181 percent return in one day?

    Earlier this year, one of my analysts logged a trade with an annualized gain of 423,181 percent. (That’s not a typo.)

    Of course, he’s no billionaire just because of that trade.

    But his trade raises a question people often have about “annualized gains.”

    I frequently get questions on how people should view annualized returns. They can be badly misused and badly misunderstood. So why would an investor even care about them? I’ll explain below why you should care about them.

    In simplest terms, annualized return calculates what would happen if you repeated a trade’s success over the course of a year. If you close a trade for a 10 percent gain over six months, you have a 20 percent annualized gain. The trading year is made up of two six-month periods. And two times a 10 percent nominal return equals a 20 percent annualized return.

    This math makes sense. It lets us compare the success of various trades over various time frames. For example, if you make 50 percent on a trade in just two months, it’s better than making the same gain in two years.

    But extreme “annualized return” examples can create absurd numbers and expectations.

    Take a trader who buys a stock and sells it the next day for a 1 percent gain. That expert can claim an annualized gain of 252 percent. (The convention is to assume there are 252 trading days each year.)

    And if you factor in the effect of compounding gains, the numbers get even bigger. Compounding returns refers to when one day’s gains are reinvested the next day, increasing the value of each subsequent day’s gain. If you calculate compounding returns, the trader can claim an annualized return of 1,127 percent.

    A similar distortion resulted in my analyst’s eye-popping return: He recently closed a trade for a 114.29 percent gain in 23 days. Accounting for compounding returns, he can legitimately claim a six-figure annualized rate of return.

    I think you can quickly tell this is unrealistic and probably impossible. Annualized gains may look good. But they don’t put any money in your pocket. You can’t buy anything with them.

    Also remember, since you can’t lose more than 100 percent on most investments, a 1 percent loss in a single day comes out to an annualized loss of 92 percent. (If you shave 1 percent off the value of something every day, you’ll never reach zero. You simply end up cutting smaller and smaller pieces off a smaller and smaller pie.)

    Compare that with the annualized gain of 1,127 percent, and you can see how adding up a bunch of annualized gains can quickly distort the truth.

    If that’s the case, why use “annualized gains” at all?

    Because annualized returns are a key tool for comparing the returns of investments with different timeframes.

    Suppose I offer you the choice of two investments.

    Investment A will return 4 percent in three months. Investment B will return 7 percent in five months. It’s clear that Investment B offers a higher return, but it will take longer to get it.

    This is where using annualized gains can help. Investment A has an annualized return of 16.99 percent. Investment B has an annualized return of 17.63 percent. Investment B still offers the better return.

    So what are the rules to annualized gains?

    First, don’t take them as gospel if someone is trying to convince you of an investment or trading strategy. Second, the shorter the time period, the less useful annualized gains get. (Think about the one-day trade example.)

    Again, to calculate your own annualized gains, you just need to do a little bit of simple math. Start with how long the trade will last (or lasted). Then, figure out how many of those time periods fit in a year. Finally, multiply the result by the gains.

    So let’s say you have a trade that will close in three months. There are four three-month periods in a year. If the trade returns 10 percent, your annualized return is 40 percent (four times 10 percent).

    Of course, as the saying goes, you can’t “eat” annualized returns. And you should always be skeptical if an annualized gain sounds outlandish.

    But don’t dismiss them entirely. They’re a handy tool for comparing different trades.

    Here’s to our health, wealth and a great retirement,

    — Dr. David Eifrig

    This article originally ran on Wednesday, Aug. 14, at DailyWealth.com.

    Dr. David Eifrig Jr. is the editor of two of Stansberry's best advisory services. One of his advisories, Retirement Millionaire, is a monthly letter showing readers how to live a millionaire lifestyle on less than you'd imagine possible. He travels around the U.S. looking for bargains, deals and great investment ideas. Already his average reader has saved $2,793 since 2008 (documented in each Retirement Millionaire issue). He also writes Retirement Trader, a bi-monthly advisory that explains simple techniques to make large, but very safe, gains in the stock and bond markets. This is a pure finance play and the reason Porter Stansberry loves having "Doc" on the team. Doc holds an MBA from Kellogg and has worked in arbitrage and trading groups with major Wall Street investment banks (Goldman Sachs). In 1995, he retired from the "Street," went to UNC-Chapel Hill for medical school and became an ophthalmologist. Now, in his latest "retirement," he joined Stansberry & Associates full-time to share with readers his experiences and ideas.

    | All posts from Dr. David Eifrig Jr.

    Discuss this Story:

    Comment Policy: We encourage open discussion. Comments including racist statements, profanity, name calling or spam will be removed at our discretion. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear it is likely because it violates the policy.

    DOT Website Has Snafu On Air Bag Recall Info
    Michigan Requires Dealers For Tesla
    Has Apple Stock Peaked?
    Turner Networks Taken Off Dish Lineup On Contract Row
    Hires Up, Greater Chances Of Raises, 401(k)s
    3 Ways To Avoid Going Off A Stock Market Cliff With The Buy-And-Hold Herd
    According To Goldman, This Is Why China’s GDP Was Better Than Expected (Spoiler Alert: Weather)
    Oil Tops $83, Gold Over $1255 As Commodities Spike Higher & Riyal Slides To 2009 Lows
    First Swiss Gold Poll Shows Pro-Gold Side In Lead At 45%
    A Closer Look Why Futures Bounced 30 Points Off The Lows On Today’s ECB BTFD Bailout
    ‘Anti-Petrodollar’ Total CEO Dies In Freak Plane Crash In Moscow
    The Crocodile Jaws Spring Open Again, Preparing To Bite
    McDonald’s Quarterly Profit Falls 30 Percent
    Apple Seen Riding Higher On Strong IPhone Demand, IPad Rebound
    Harley-Davidson Results Top View, Outlook Unchanged
    Kinder Morgan Canada Pipeline Plans Hits A Mountain Of Opposition
    Chipotle, Coca-Cola Among Biggest Premarket Movers
    Verizon Posts Lower Quarterly Profit, Higher Revenue
    EU To Fine JPMorgan, UBS, Credit Suisse Over Swiss Franc Libor Rigging
    Lockheed Boosts Third-quarter Profit 5 Percent As Sales Drop Again
    Brighter China Data Fails To Lift Stocks, Dollar Sags
    China To Pitch High-speed Trains To California
    Apple Profit Soars As Company Sells 39M New IPhones
    Toyota Widens Air Bag Recall, Issues Warning
    Total CEO Dies In Moscow Plane Crash
    Airlines Raise U.S. Fares Despite Cheaper Fuel
    Chevrolet Shrinks The New Camaro
    AbbVie Scraps Shire Deal, Boosts Dividend
    Chipotle Profit Up; Shares Fall On Food Costs
    Microsoft’s CEO Comp Could Hit $147 Million
    Read more from Investing...

    Liberty Investor Digest

    Get today's most important
    financial headlines all in
    one place by email!



    Sources


    close[X]

    Sign Up For Liberty Investor Digest™!

    Get Liberty Investor Digest FREE By Email!

    Input your name and email address in the fields below and get today's most important financial headlines sent straight to you inbox!

    Privacy PolicyYou can opt-out at any time. We protect your information like a mother hen. We will not sell or rent your email address to anyone for any reason.