Categories

Investing

Tools

  • Economy & Politics
  • Investing
  • Personal Finance
  • Related Posts


    Dollar Tree To Buy Family Dollar For $8.5 Billion
    Trendy Chipotle Burritos Show How Pricing Power Belongs To The Hip
    “Reprehensible” Lloyds Bank Agrees To $105 Million Wristslap For Manipulating Libor
    Near-Record Trulia Shorts Crushed After Zillow Acquires Incomeless Company For $3.5 Billion
    US Equities Flat While China Surges On More Stimulus And Bailout Hopes
    Like Dripping Silver Icicles
    ‘London Fix’ Gold Rigging By Bullion Bank Exposed In Class Action Lawsuit: The Complete Charts
    It Is Mostly About The US Next Week
    If You Want To Be Rich And Powerful, Majoring In STEM Is A Good Place To Start
    The Threat Of Rising Rates
    Europe Nervy As Russian Assets Hit By New Sanctions Talk
    Tyson To Sell Mexican, Brazilian Poultry Businesses To JBS
    Hague Court Orders Russia To Pay Over $50 Billion In Yukos Case
    Futures Flat With S&P 500 Near Record Levels
    Microsoft Says Government Officials Make Sudden Visits To China Offices


    The Right Way to View ‘Annualized Gain’ Claims

    Who wouldn’t like to claim a 423,181 percent return in one day?

    Earlier this year, one of my analysts logged a trade with an annualized gain of 423,181 percent. (That’s not a typo.)

    Of course, he’s no billionaire just because of that trade.

    But his trade raises a question people often have about “annualized gains.”

    I frequently get questions on how people should view annualized returns. They can be badly misused and badly misunderstood. So why would an investor even care about them? I’ll explain below why you should care about them.

    In simplest terms, annualized return calculates what would happen if you repeated a trade’s success over the course of a year. If you close a trade for a 10 percent gain over six months, you have a 20 percent annualized gain. The trading year is made up of two six-month periods. And two times a 10 percent nominal return equals a 20 percent annualized return.

    This math makes sense. It lets us compare the success of various trades over various time frames. For example, if you make 50 percent on a trade in just two months, it’s better than making the same gain in two years.

    But extreme “annualized return” examples can create absurd numbers and expectations.

    Take a trader who buys a stock and sells it the next day for a 1 percent gain. That expert can claim an annualized gain of 252 percent. (The convention is to assume there are 252 trading days each year.)

    And if you factor in the effect of compounding gains, the numbers get even bigger. Compounding returns refers to when one day’s gains are reinvested the next day, increasing the value of each subsequent day’s gain. If you calculate compounding returns, the trader can claim an annualized return of 1,127 percent.

    A similar distortion resulted in my analyst’s eye-popping return: He recently closed a trade for a 114.29 percent gain in 23 days. Accounting for compounding returns, he can legitimately claim a six-figure annualized rate of return.

    I think you can quickly tell this is unrealistic and probably impossible. Annualized gains may look good. But they don’t put any money in your pocket. You can’t buy anything with them.

    Also remember, since you can’t lose more than 100 percent on most investments, a 1 percent loss in a single day comes out to an annualized loss of 92 percent. (If you shave 1 percent off the value of something every day, you’ll never reach zero. You simply end up cutting smaller and smaller pieces off a smaller and smaller pie.)

    Compare that with the annualized gain of 1,127 percent, and you can see how adding up a bunch of annualized gains can quickly distort the truth.

    If that’s the case, why use “annualized gains” at all?

    Because annualized returns are a key tool for comparing the returns of investments with different timeframes.

    Suppose I offer you the choice of two investments.

    Investment A will return 4 percent in three months. Investment B will return 7 percent in five months. It’s clear that Investment B offers a higher return, but it will take longer to get it.

    This is where using annualized gains can help. Investment A has an annualized return of 16.99 percent. Investment B has an annualized return of 17.63 percent. Investment B still offers the better return.

    So what are the rules to annualized gains?

    First, don’t take them as gospel if someone is trying to convince you of an investment or trading strategy. Second, the shorter the time period, the less useful annualized gains get. (Think about the one-day trade example.)

    Again, to calculate your own annualized gains, you just need to do a little bit of simple math. Start with how long the trade will last (or lasted). Then, figure out how many of those time periods fit in a year. Finally, multiply the result by the gains.

    So let’s say you have a trade that will close in three months. There are four three-month periods in a year. If the trade returns 10 percent, your annualized return is 40 percent (four times 10 percent).

    Of course, as the saying goes, you can’t “eat” annualized returns. And you should always be skeptical if an annualized gain sounds outlandish.

    But don’t dismiss them entirely. They’re a handy tool for comparing different trades.

    Here’s to our health, wealth and a great retirement,

    — Dr. David Eifrig

    This article originally ran on Wednesday, Aug. 14, at DailyWealth.com.

    Dr. David Eifrig Jr. is the editor of two of Stansberry's best advisory services. One of his advisories, Retirement Millionaire, is a monthly letter showing readers how to live a millionaire lifestyle on less than you'd imagine possible. He travels around the U.S. looking for bargains, deals and great investment ideas. Already his average reader has saved $2,793 since 2008 (documented in each Retirement Millionaire issue). He also writes Retirement Trader, a bi-monthly advisory that explains simple techniques to make large, but very safe, gains in the stock and bond markets. This is a pure finance play and the reason Porter Stansberry loves having "Doc" on the team. Doc holds an MBA from Kellogg and has worked in arbitrage and trading groups with major Wall Street investment banks (Goldman Sachs). In 1995, he retired from the "Street," went to UNC-Chapel Hill for medical school and became an ophthalmologist. Now, in his latest "retirement," he joined Stansberry & Associates full-time to share with readers his experiences and ideas.

    | All posts from Dr. David Eifrig Jr.

    Discuss this Story:

    Comment Policy: We encourage open discussion. Comments including racist statements, profanity, name calling or spam will be removed at our discretion. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear it is likely because it violates the policy.

    Pfizer’s Need For Deal Looms Larger With Earnings Report
    China Condemns U.S. Anti-dumping Duties On Solar Imports
    JD.com To Sell Microsoft’s Xbox One Games Console In China
    Scandal-hit China Food Firm Withdrawing All Products, U.S. Parent Says
    Russia To Ban Several McDonalds Burgers Including Royal And Filet-O-Fish
    Starbucks Sales In Americas Region Up Slightly More Than Expected
    Futures Dragged Down By Visa, Amazon Despite USDJPY Levitation
    CEO Of Russia’s 2nd Largest Gold Producer Is ‘Horrified’ At Market Manipulation
    Creation Of S&P 500 ETFs Rises To All Time High
    Barclays Thinks Its Dark Pool Is Fine
    Are You A .Ninja Or A .Guru?
    GM Recalls Far From Calamity For Some Dealers Who Find New Customers, Business
    Stock Futures Dip On Weak Results; Durable Goods Data Due
    Russian Consumer Watchdog Seeks Ban On Some McDonalds’ Products
    Euro, Shares Sag As Ukraine Woes Hit German Confidence
    In China Meat Scandal, McDonald’s Japan Switches To Thai Chicken, No Nuggets In Hong Kong
    Shares In Britain’s RBS Soar After Surprise Profit
    Vodafone Revenue Dragged Lower By Spain And South Africa In First Quarter
    PetroChina Reconsiders Sale Of Natural Gas Pipeline Assets
    Sluggish Latin American Results Show Risks For U.S. Companies
    Amazon’s Heavy Investing Eats Into Bottom Line, Shares Drop
    China Meat Supplier Faced Claims Last Year Over Unethical Work Practices
    U.S. Judge Says She Is Troubled By Apple $450 Million E-books Deal
    BNP Paribas To Pay $80 Million For Defrauding U.S. Agriculture Department
    Nucor Confident Of Favorable Rulings Vs Steel Import ‘Tsunami’
    How To Tell If Your 401(k) Stinks
    Boeing Reaches Plane Parts Deal With Iran
    Legal Tender Renders Planning Impossible
    It’s Time For The BRICS To Counter U.S. Destabilization Efforts
    Goldman Goes Schizo On Gold: Boosts Price Target To $1200 Even As It Is “Selling It With Conviction”
    Read more from Investing...

    Liberty Investor Digest

    Get today's most important
    financial headlines all in
    one place by email!



    Sources


    close[X]

    Sign Up For Liberty Investor Digest™!

    Get Liberty Investor Digest FREE By Email!

    Input your name and email address in the fields below and get today's most important financial headlines sent straight to you inbox!

    Privacy PolicyYou can opt-out at any time. We protect your information like a mother hen. We will not sell or rent your email address to anyone for any reason.