Categories

Investing

Tools

  • Economy & Politics
  • Investing
  • Personal Finance
  • Related Posts


    Time To Rethink The Rupee
    Banks Will Keep Doing FX Stuff That Got Them In Trouble
    Chinese Stock Bubble Frenzy Returns; US Futures Flat Ahead Of Today’s Pre-Holiday Zero Volume Melt Up
    This October The World Will Change — ‘China Is Preparing For Something Big’
    What Bitcoin’s History Means For Its Future: Q&A With Nathaniel Popper, Author Of ‘Digital Gold’
    Invest Like The Best: Seven Buffett And Lynch-Inspired Stock Buys
    Apple Watch Orders Fell Sharply After The First Day And Haven’t Grown Since, A Shopping Data Firm Says
    Lean Times For The Diet Industry
    A Chinese App That Steals WiFi Passwords Just Raised $50 Million
    This Tech Company Had A Blockbuster First Day Of Trading Following IPO
    Google Maps Just Got Way Better
    $1,397 An Hour! Top Paid McDonald’s Execs
    Lumber Liquidators Plunges As CEO Resigns
    Pain And Pleasure: IPOs
    Seven Stocks Are Like Giant Piggy Banks


    The Right Way to View ‘Annualized Gain’ Claims

    Who wouldn’t like to claim a 423,181 percent return in one day?

    Earlier this year, one of my analysts logged a trade with an annualized gain of 423,181 percent. (That’s not a typo.)

    Of course, he’s no billionaire just because of that trade.

    But his trade raises a question people often have about “annualized gains.”

    I frequently get questions on how people should view annualized returns. They can be badly misused and badly misunderstood. So why would an investor even care about them? I’ll explain below why you should care about them.

    In simplest terms, annualized return calculates what would happen if you repeated a trade’s success over the course of a year. If you close a trade for a 10 percent gain over six months, you have a 20 percent annualized gain. The trading year is made up of two six-month periods. And two times a 10 percent nominal return equals a 20 percent annualized return.

    This math makes sense. It lets us compare the success of various trades over various time frames. For example, if you make 50 percent on a trade in just two months, it’s better than making the same gain in two years.

    But extreme “annualized return” examples can create absurd numbers and expectations.

    Take a trader who buys a stock and sells it the next day for a 1 percent gain. That expert can claim an annualized gain of 252 percent. (The convention is to assume there are 252 trading days each year.)

    And if you factor in the effect of compounding gains, the numbers get even bigger. Compounding returns refers to when one day’s gains are reinvested the next day, increasing the value of each subsequent day’s gain. If you calculate compounding returns, the trader can claim an annualized return of 1,127 percent.

    A similar distortion resulted in my analyst’s eye-popping return: He recently closed a trade for a 114.29 percent gain in 23 days. Accounting for compounding returns, he can legitimately claim a six-figure annualized rate of return.

    I think you can quickly tell this is unrealistic and probably impossible. Annualized gains may look good. But they don’t put any money in your pocket. You can’t buy anything with them.

    Also remember, since you can’t lose more than 100 percent on most investments, a 1 percent loss in a single day comes out to an annualized loss of 92 percent. (If you shave 1 percent off the value of something every day, you’ll never reach zero. You simply end up cutting smaller and smaller pieces off a smaller and smaller pie.)

    Compare that with the annualized gain of 1,127 percent, and you can see how adding up a bunch of annualized gains can quickly distort the truth.

    If that’s the case, why use “annualized gains” at all?

    Because annualized returns are a key tool for comparing the returns of investments with different timeframes.

    Suppose I offer you the choice of two investments.

    Investment A will return 4 percent in three months. Investment B will return 7 percent in five months. It’s clear that Investment B offers a higher return, but it will take longer to get it.

    This is where using annualized gains can help. Investment A has an annualized return of 16.99 percent. Investment B has an annualized return of 17.63 percent. Investment B still offers the better return.

    So what are the rules to annualized gains?

    First, don’t take them as gospel if someone is trying to convince you of an investment or trading strategy. Second, the shorter the time period, the less useful annualized gains get. (Think about the one-day trade example.)

    Again, to calculate your own annualized gains, you just need to do a little bit of simple math. Start with how long the trade will last (or lasted). Then, figure out how many of those time periods fit in a year. Finally, multiply the result by the gains.

    So let’s say you have a trade that will close in three months. There are four three-month periods in a year. If the trade returns 10 percent, your annualized return is 40 percent (four times 10 percent).

    Of course, as the saying goes, you can’t “eat” annualized returns. And you should always be skeptical if an annualized gain sounds outlandish.

    But don’t dismiss them entirely. They’re a handy tool for comparing different trades.

    Here’s to our health, wealth and a great retirement,

    — Dr. David Eifrig

    This article originally ran on Wednesday, Aug. 14, at DailyWealth.com.

    Dr. David Eifrig Jr. is the editor of two of Stansberry's best advisory services. One of his advisories, Retirement Millionaire, is a monthly letter showing readers how to live a millionaire lifestyle on less than you'd imagine possible. He travels around the U.S. looking for bargains, deals and great investment ideas. Already his average reader has saved $2,793 since 2008 (documented in each Retirement Millionaire issue). He also writes Retirement Trader, a bi-monthly advisory that explains simple techniques to make large, but very safe, gains in the stock and bond markets. This is a pure finance play and the reason Porter Stansberry loves having "Doc" on the team. Doc holds an MBA from Kellogg and has worked in arbitrage and trading groups with major Wall Street investment banks (Goldman Sachs). In 1995, he retired from the "Street," went to UNC-Chapel Hill for medical school and became an ophthalmologist. Now, in his latest "retirement," he joined Stansberry & Associates full-time to share with readers his experiences and ideas.

    | All posts from Dr. David Eifrig Jr.

    Discuss this Story:

    Comment Policy: We encourage open discussion. Comments including racist statements, profanity, name calling or spam will be removed at our discretion. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear it is likely because it violates the policy.

    U.S. Drivers Yield ‘Swing’ Oil Demand Crown To Saudis
    Stocks Get That Friday Feeling As Stimulus Trumps Growth Concern
    Wal-Mart To Bring In-house Some Sourcing Handled By Li & Fung
    Charter In Talks With Time Warner Cable Over Bid Likely Above $170 Per Share: WSJ
    HP Sells $2.3 Billion China Unit Stake To Forge Partnership With Tsinghua Unigroup
    Bank FX Fine Scorecard (Follow Along At Home!)
    New Archeological Discovery Suggests Our Ancestors Evolved Far Earlier Than Previously Thought
    China Is Lending The World’s Most Indebted Company Another $10 Billion
    The Tech Portfolio Built To Beat The Market
    What’s The Plains All American Stock Price After The California Oil Spill?
    This Startup Valuation Chart Shows The World’s Most Valuable Startups
    How To Play Yahoo! Inc. Stock After Tuesday’s Sell-Off
    You’ll Never See A Better Moment To Invest In China
    Here’s The Real Scoop On Apple Watch Demand
    The War On Big Food
    The BP Oil Spill Killed A Lot Of Dolphins
    Another Hong Kong Stock Disaster As Goldin Loses $25 Billion
    This Is The Latest $1 Billion Tech Company To IPO
    Cancer Charities Agree To Dissolve Amid Fraud Claims
    KFC Is Making Plans To Get Back On Top In The U.S.
    Best Buy Profit Beats On Strong Demand For TVs, Smartphones
    CVS To Buy Pharmacy Services Provider Omnicare For $10.1 Billion
    Futures Lower As Fed Rate Hike Seen Further Out
    Lenovo Annual Profit Up 1 Percent, Missing Forecasts, Amid China Smartphone Competition
    Deutsche Telekom To Consider Partner For T-Mobile US
    Shares Subdued By Mixed China, Euro Zone PMI Data
    Small Food Makers On Fast Path To U.S. Store Shelves, Threatening Big Producers
    Five Banks To Plead Guilty To Criminal Rigging Charges, Pay $5.6 Billion For Manipulating Markets
    The Market’s One-Sided Game Of Chicken
    Delayed Fed Rate Hike May Not Help Stocks
    Read more from Investing...

    Liberty Investor Digest

    Get today's most important
    financial headlines all in
    one place by email!



    Sources


    close[X]

    Sign Up For Liberty Investor Digest™!

    Get Liberty Investor Digest FREE By Email!

    Input your name and email address in the fields below and get today's most important financial headlines sent straight to you inbox!

    Privacy PolicyYou can opt-out at any time. We protect your information like a mother hen. We will not sell or rent your email address to anyone for any reason.