• Economy & Politics
  • Investing
  • Personal Finance
  • Related Posts

    Day After Deutsche Bank Admits Not All Is Well, Swiss Giant Credit Suisse Also Admits It Needs More Cash
    Syrian Crisis: What Will Happen Next?
    St. Louis Prepares For ‘Catastrophic Event’ As Underground Fire Nears Nuclear Waste Cache
    Who’s Phooling Whom?
    Six Rules For Navigating Volatile Markets
    90-second Oil Change: Castrol Claims Breakthrough
    Yum CEO Promises Action As Stock Tumbles 18%
    Can AWS Break The Lock-in Mold Set By Legacy Tech Giants?
    Germany’s Deutsche Bank Warns Of A Record Loss
    Amazon Just Launched Its Etsy Killer: Handmade
    Inside LA’s New, Futuristic Store — Magic Mirrors Included
    Retailers Expecting A Good, But Not Great Christmas Season
    Viacom Is Losing Its Most Prized Asset, And It’s Not Sumner Redstone
    The Only Gun Store Left In San Francisco Is Closing Down
    The World’s First Airport For Drones Will Be Built In Rwanda

    The Right Way to View ‘Annualized Gain’ Claims

    Who wouldn’t like to claim a 423,181 percent return in one day?

    Earlier this year, one of my analysts logged a trade with an annualized gain of 423,181 percent. (That’s not a typo.)

    Of course, he’s no billionaire just because of that trade.

    But his trade raises a question people often have about “annualized gains.”

    I frequently get questions on how people should view annualized returns. They can be badly misused and badly misunderstood. So why would an investor even care about them? I’ll explain below why you should care about them.

    In simplest terms, annualized return calculates what would happen if you repeated a trade’s success over the course of a year. If you close a trade for a 10 percent gain over six months, you have a 20 percent annualized gain. The trading year is made up of two six-month periods. And two times a 10 percent nominal return equals a 20 percent annualized return.

    This math makes sense. It lets us compare the success of various trades over various time frames. For example, if you make 50 percent on a trade in just two months, it’s better than making the same gain in two years.

    But extreme “annualized return” examples can create absurd numbers and expectations.

    Take a trader who buys a stock and sells it the next day for a 1 percent gain. That expert can claim an annualized gain of 252 percent. (The convention is to assume there are 252 trading days each year.)

    And if you factor in the effect of compounding gains, the numbers get even bigger. Compounding returns refers to when one day’s gains are reinvested the next day, increasing the value of each subsequent day’s gain. If you calculate compounding returns, the trader can claim an annualized return of 1,127 percent.

    A similar distortion resulted in my analyst’s eye-popping return: He recently closed a trade for a 114.29 percent gain in 23 days. Accounting for compounding returns, he can legitimately claim a six-figure annualized rate of return.

    I think you can quickly tell this is unrealistic and probably impossible. Annualized gains may look good. But they don’t put any money in your pocket. You can’t buy anything with them.

    Also remember, since you can’t lose more than 100 percent on most investments, a 1 percent loss in a single day comes out to an annualized loss of 92 percent. (If you shave 1 percent off the value of something every day, you’ll never reach zero. You simply end up cutting smaller and smaller pieces off a smaller and smaller pie.)

    Compare that with the annualized gain of 1,127 percent, and you can see how adding up a bunch of annualized gains can quickly distort the truth.

    If that’s the case, why use “annualized gains” at all?

    Because annualized returns are a key tool for comparing the returns of investments with different timeframes.

    Suppose I offer you the choice of two investments.

    Investment A will return 4 percent in three months. Investment B will return 7 percent in five months. It’s clear that Investment B offers a higher return, but it will take longer to get it.

    This is where using annualized gains can help. Investment A has an annualized return of 16.99 percent. Investment B has an annualized return of 17.63 percent. Investment B still offers the better return.

    So what are the rules to annualized gains?

    First, don’t take them as gospel if someone is trying to convince you of an investment or trading strategy. Second, the shorter the time period, the less useful annualized gains get. (Think about the one-day trade example.)

    Again, to calculate your own annualized gains, you just need to do a little bit of simple math. Start with how long the trade will last (or lasted). Then, figure out how many of those time periods fit in a year. Finally, multiply the result by the gains.

    So let’s say you have a trade that will close in three months. There are four three-month periods in a year. If the trade returns 10 percent, your annualized return is 40 percent (four times 10 percent).

    Of course, as the saying goes, you can’t “eat” annualized returns. And you should always be skeptical if an annualized gain sounds outlandish.

    But don’t dismiss them entirely. They’re a handy tool for comparing different trades.

    Here’s to our health, wealth and a great retirement,

    — Dr. David Eifrig

    This article originally ran on Wednesday, Aug. 14, at

    Dr. David Eifrig Jr. is the editor of two of Stansberry's best advisory services. One of his advisories, Retirement Millionaire, is a monthly letter showing readers how to live a millionaire lifestyle on less than you'd imagine possible. He travels around the U.S. looking for bargains, deals and great investment ideas. Already his average reader has saved $2,793 since 2008 (documented in each Retirement Millionaire issue). He also writes Retirement Trader, a bi-monthly advisory that explains simple techniques to make large, but very safe, gains in the stock and bond markets. This is a pure finance play and the reason Porter Stansberry loves having "Doc" on the team. Doc holds an MBA from Kellogg and has worked in arbitrage and trading groups with major Wall Street investment banks (Goldman Sachs). In 1995, he retired from the "Street," went to UNC-Chapel Hill for medical school and became an ophthalmologist. Now, in his latest "retirement," he joined Stansberry & Associates full-time to share with readers his experiences and ideas.

    | All posts from Dr. David Eifrig Jr.

    Discuss this Story:

    Comment Policy: We encourage open discussion. Comments including racist statements, profanity, name calling or spam will be removed at our discretion. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear it is likely because it violates the policy.

    How To Profit From The Coming Bear Market
    Three Factors Will Change Natural Gas Investing Forever
    VW Stock: Don’t Go Bottom Fishing Yet
    Should I Buy GoPro Stock?
    Wall St. Set To Open Lower Ahead Of Fed Minutes
    Oil Rallies But U.S. Supply May Temper Gains
    Dell In Talks To Buy Data Storage Company EMC
    Uniqlo To Rein In U.S. Store Openings After Missing Profit Guidance
    All Eyes On ADM And Bunge After Cargill Profit Jumps 20 Percent
    This Month Could Make Or Break The Oil Markets
    At Least “Black Box” Glencore Is Less Complex Than Enron
    Battered Biotechs Trigger First “Death Cross” In 4 Years
    Gold & Silver Slammed Off Technical Levels
    Q3 Earnings Bloodbath Continues With Terrible Monsanto Results: Company Fires 2,600 As It Boosts Buyback
    Commodity Trading Giants Unleash Liquidity Scramble, Issue Record Amounts Of Secured Debt
    Oil Prices Are Soaring As Saudi Arabia Gets The Upper Hand Over Shale Producers
    Google Reveals AMP, Its Plan To Speed Up The Mobile Web
    Amazon Web Services To Windows Shops: Come On Over!
    Here’s Why Microsoft’s Lumia 950, Lumia 950 XL Phones Are A Big Deal
    How Apple Helped Boost Samsung’s Profits By 80%
    Gary Shilling’s Bearish Outlook On Energy And Commodities
    Yale Just Released 170,000 Government Photos Of The Great Depression
    Never Trust The First Number Announced In A Data Breach
    The Three Things Humans Will Always Do Better Than Robots
    Nine Blue Chip Bargain Buys
    10 Winning Stocks In Two Lousy Sectors
    Emerging Markets, Miners A Screaming Buy, Says Morgan Stanley
    Apple’s Real Cash Pile Is 99% Smaller Than You Think
    S&P 500 Under 1,800? That’s Better News Than You Think
    Gold Rallies, Scores Best Settlement In Over A Week
    Read more from Investing...

    Liberty Investor Digest

    Get today's most important
    financial headlines all in
    one place by email!



    Sign Up For Liberty Investor Digest™!

    Get Liberty Investor Digest FREE By Email!

    Input your name and email address in the fields below and get today's most important financial headlines sent straight to you inbox!

    Privacy PolicyYou can opt-out at any time. We protect your information like a mother hen. We will not sell or rent your email address to anyone for any reason.