Categories

Investing

Tools

  • Economy & Politics
  • Investing
  • Personal Finance
  • Related Posts


    Insider Traders And Whistle-Blowers
    German Parliament Approves Greek Bailout After Schauble Makes It Clear Germany Remains In Charge
    Don’t Show This To Warren Buffett (Gold Vs. The Financial System)
    Today’s The Day? Nasdaq Just 12 Shy Of 5000
    Nine Companies Put Your Cash To Good Use
    Top Stock In 15 Years Up Huge Again!
    FCC Approves New Net Neutrality Rules
    The Only Public Hedge Fund You Should Own
    Natural Gas News: Lower Prices Won’t Hurt Sector’s Profit Power
    Cheniere Energy Still The Sector’s Best Pick
    Play This ‘Hidden’ M&A Boom — And Beat The Market For The Next Two Years
    The New Wearable Tech That Lets You Walk On Mars
    Tencent’s Employees Queue For Hours To Receive “Red Envelopes” Containing As Little As $1.60
    Priceline And Expedia Are Spending More And More To Get You To Book A Hotel Room
    Low Oil Prices Are Hitting The UK Where It Hurts: The North Sea


    The Right Way to View ‘Annualized Gain’ Claims

    Who wouldn’t like to claim a 423,181 percent return in one day?

    Earlier this year, one of my analysts logged a trade with an annualized gain of 423,181 percent. (That’s not a typo.)

    Of course, he’s no billionaire just because of that trade.

    But his trade raises a question people often have about “annualized gains.”

    I frequently get questions on how people should view annualized returns. They can be badly misused and badly misunderstood. So why would an investor even care about them? I’ll explain below why you should care about them.

    In simplest terms, annualized return calculates what would happen if you repeated a trade’s success over the course of a year. If you close a trade for a 10 percent gain over six months, you have a 20 percent annualized gain. The trading year is made up of two six-month periods. And two times a 10 percent nominal return equals a 20 percent annualized return.

    This math makes sense. It lets us compare the success of various trades over various time frames. For example, if you make 50 percent on a trade in just two months, it’s better than making the same gain in two years.

    But extreme “annualized return” examples can create absurd numbers and expectations.

    Take a trader who buys a stock and sells it the next day for a 1 percent gain. That expert can claim an annualized gain of 252 percent. (The convention is to assume there are 252 trading days each year.)

    And if you factor in the effect of compounding gains, the numbers get even bigger. Compounding returns refers to when one day’s gains are reinvested the next day, increasing the value of each subsequent day’s gain. If you calculate compounding returns, the trader can claim an annualized return of 1,127 percent.

    A similar distortion resulted in my analyst’s eye-popping return: He recently closed a trade for a 114.29 percent gain in 23 days. Accounting for compounding returns, he can legitimately claim a six-figure annualized rate of return.

    I think you can quickly tell this is unrealistic and probably impossible. Annualized gains may look good. But they don’t put any money in your pocket. You can’t buy anything with them.

    Also remember, since you can’t lose more than 100 percent on most investments, a 1 percent loss in a single day comes out to an annualized loss of 92 percent. (If you shave 1 percent off the value of something every day, you’ll never reach zero. You simply end up cutting smaller and smaller pieces off a smaller and smaller pie.)

    Compare that with the annualized gain of 1,127 percent, and you can see how adding up a bunch of annualized gains can quickly distort the truth.

    If that’s the case, why use “annualized gains” at all?

    Because annualized returns are a key tool for comparing the returns of investments with different timeframes.

    Suppose I offer you the choice of two investments.

    Investment A will return 4 percent in three months. Investment B will return 7 percent in five months. It’s clear that Investment B offers a higher return, but it will take longer to get it.

    This is where using annualized gains can help. Investment A has an annualized return of 16.99 percent. Investment B has an annualized return of 17.63 percent. Investment B still offers the better return.

    So what are the rules to annualized gains?

    First, don’t take them as gospel if someone is trying to convince you of an investment or trading strategy. Second, the shorter the time period, the less useful annualized gains get. (Think about the one-day trade example.)

    Again, to calculate your own annualized gains, you just need to do a little bit of simple math. Start with how long the trade will last (or lasted). Then, figure out how many of those time periods fit in a year. Finally, multiply the result by the gains.

    So let’s say you have a trade that will close in three months. There are four three-month periods in a year. If the trade returns 10 percent, your annualized return is 40 percent (four times 10 percent).

    Of course, as the saying goes, you can’t “eat” annualized returns. And you should always be skeptical if an annualized gain sounds outlandish.

    But don’t dismiss them entirely. They’re a handy tool for comparing different trades.

    Here’s to our health, wealth and a great retirement,

    — Dr. David Eifrig

    This article originally ran on Wednesday, Aug. 14, at DailyWealth.com.

    Dr. David Eifrig Jr. is the editor of two of Stansberry's best advisory services. One of his advisories, Retirement Millionaire, is a monthly letter showing readers how to live a millionaire lifestyle on less than you'd imagine possible. He travels around the U.S. looking for bargains, deals and great investment ideas. Already his average reader has saved $2,793 since 2008 (documented in each Retirement Millionaire issue). He also writes Retirement Trader, a bi-monthly advisory that explains simple techniques to make large, but very safe, gains in the stock and bond markets. This is a pure finance play and the reason Porter Stansberry loves having "Doc" on the team. Doc holds an MBA from Kellogg and has worked in arbitrage and trading groups with major Wall Street investment banks (Goldman Sachs). In 1995, he retired from the "Street," went to UNC-Chapel Hill for medical school and became an ophthalmologist. Now, in his latest "retirement," he joined Stansberry & Associates full-time to share with readers his experiences and ideas.

    | All posts from Dr. David Eifrig Jr.

    Discuss this Story:

    Comment Policy: We encourage open discussion. Comments including racist statements, profanity, name calling or spam will be removed at our discretion. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear it is likely because it violates the policy.

    U.S. Fourth-quarter Growth Rate Revised Down To 2.2 Percent
    Some Staff Say India’s Sahara Has Not Paid Salaries For Months
    Futures Flat Ahead Of GDP, Consumer Sentiment
    Brent Rises To $61, Set For First Monthly Gain Since July
    European Shares At Fresh Seven-year High As ECB QE Nears
    After Indonesia Retreat, GM Retrenches In Thailand, Too
    AstraZeneca To Carve Out Antibiotic R&D Into Separate Firm
    Buffett, A Cheerleader For America, Takes His Checkbook Abroad
    Ericsson Sues Apple For Telecom Patent Infringement
    IBM Targets $40 Billion In Cloud, Other Growth Areas By 2018
    Bank Of America Accounting Chief, Two Directors To Step Down
    For Macy’s, Going Downmarket Looks Like The Way Ahead
    WTI Follows Algo-Idiot-Inventory Template: Slides Back Below $50
    This Is What Happens To Gold In A Hyperinflationary Currency Crisis: Ukraine Edition
    Is This The Most Important Chart For The Future Of The World’s Reserve Currency?
    Visualizing Who Controls The World’s Silver Supply?
    Sears Turnaround Shows Signs Of Success
    Shhhh: Your Secrets Aren’t Safe At The Office
    Seven Companies Bleed Cash Like Crazy
    Google Weighs Stake In Jawbone
    ‘Armageddon’ Cyber Bank Attack Coming?
    Adobe Saved Photoshop By Ditching Boxes For The Cloud
    It’s Getting Better To Be The Little Guy In U.S. Banking
    StanChart Picks Ex-JPMorgan Exec Winters As CEO In Major Overhaul
    Futures Flat Ahead Of Data Flurry
    Oil Up Near $62 After Saudi Comments On Demand
    Global Equities Hit New Record As Cheap Money Reigns
    Allianz Earnings And Dividend Disappoint, Shares Down
    Spain’s Iberdrola To Buy UIL Holdings For About $3 Billion
    GM Cuts Capacity, Jobs In Indonesia, Where Japanese Dominate
    Read more from Investing...

    Liberty Investor Digest

    Get today's most important
    financial headlines all in
    one place by email!



    Sources


    close[X]

    Sign Up For Liberty Investor Digest™!

    Get Liberty Investor Digest FREE By Email!

    Input your name and email address in the fields below and get today's most important financial headlines sent straight to you inbox!

    Privacy PolicyYou can opt-out at any time. We protect your information like a mother hen. We will not sell or rent your email address to anyone for any reason.