• Economy & Politics
  • Investing
  • Personal Finance
  • Related Posts

    Is The ‘Easy’ Money Over For European Stocks?
    Europe Cracks Down On Bitcoin, Virtual Currencies To “Curb Terrorism Funding”
    For Caterpillar The Depression Has Never Been Worse… But It Has A Cunning Plan How To Deal With It
    A Modest Proposal: All Companies Should Shut Down At Age 18
    Star Wars Could Break Box Office Records After This News
    Leave Bitcoin Alone. Abolish Cash Instead.
    What UnitedHealth Doesn’t Mean For Obamacare
    This Could Be The Next Weapon Of Mass Destruction
    Warren Buffett Stocks To Ditch In 2015
    What Are The Stock Buyback Benefits For Investors?
    The Eerie Link Between The Federal Reserve And The Sinking Of The Titanic
    What The $16.6 Billion Nokia Merger Means For Investors Today
    New Salmon Is The First GM Animal Approved For Sale As Food
    Wal-Mart Scrimped On Hiring As Store Space Grew Rapidly
    Aetna Says Individual Obamacare Business Performing As Expected

    The Right Way to View ‘Annualized Gain’ Claims

    Who wouldn’t like to claim a 423,181 percent return in one day?

    Earlier this year, one of my analysts logged a trade with an annualized gain of 423,181 percent. (That’s not a typo.)

    Of course, he’s no billionaire just because of that trade.

    But his trade raises a question people often have about “annualized gains.”

    I frequently get questions on how people should view annualized returns. They can be badly misused and badly misunderstood. So why would an investor even care about them? I’ll explain below why you should care about them.

    In simplest terms, annualized return calculates what would happen if you repeated a trade’s success over the course of a year. If you close a trade for a 10 percent gain over six months, you have a 20 percent annualized gain. The trading year is made up of two six-month periods. And two times a 10 percent nominal return equals a 20 percent annualized return.

    This math makes sense. It lets us compare the success of various trades over various time frames. For example, if you make 50 percent on a trade in just two months, it’s better than making the same gain in two years.

    But extreme “annualized return” examples can create absurd numbers and expectations.

    Take a trader who buys a stock and sells it the next day for a 1 percent gain. That expert can claim an annualized gain of 252 percent. (The convention is to assume there are 252 trading days each year.)

    And if you factor in the effect of compounding gains, the numbers get even bigger. Compounding returns refers to when one day’s gains are reinvested the next day, increasing the value of each subsequent day’s gain. If you calculate compounding returns, the trader can claim an annualized return of 1,127 percent.

    A similar distortion resulted in my analyst’s eye-popping return: He recently closed a trade for a 114.29 percent gain in 23 days. Accounting for compounding returns, he can legitimately claim a six-figure annualized rate of return.

    I think you can quickly tell this is unrealistic and probably impossible. Annualized gains may look good. But they don’t put any money in your pocket. You can’t buy anything with them.

    Also remember, since you can’t lose more than 100 percent on most investments, a 1 percent loss in a single day comes out to an annualized loss of 92 percent. (If you shave 1 percent off the value of something every day, you’ll never reach zero. You simply end up cutting smaller and smaller pieces off a smaller and smaller pie.)

    Compare that with the annualized gain of 1,127 percent, and you can see how adding up a bunch of annualized gains can quickly distort the truth.

    If that’s the case, why use “annualized gains” at all?

    Because annualized returns are a key tool for comparing the returns of investments with different timeframes.

    Suppose I offer you the choice of two investments.

    Investment A will return 4 percent in three months. Investment B will return 7 percent in five months. It’s clear that Investment B offers a higher return, but it will take longer to get it.

    This is where using annualized gains can help. Investment A has an annualized return of 16.99 percent. Investment B has an annualized return of 17.63 percent. Investment B still offers the better return.

    So what are the rules to annualized gains?

    First, don’t take them as gospel if someone is trying to convince you of an investment or trading strategy. Second, the shorter the time period, the less useful annualized gains get. (Think about the one-day trade example.)

    Again, to calculate your own annualized gains, you just need to do a little bit of simple math. Start with how long the trade will last (or lasted). Then, figure out how many of those time periods fit in a year. Finally, multiply the result by the gains.

    So let’s say you have a trade that will close in three months. There are four three-month periods in a year. If the trade returns 10 percent, your annualized return is 40 percent (four times 10 percent).

    Of course, as the saying goes, you can’t “eat” annualized returns. And you should always be skeptical if an annualized gain sounds outlandish.

    But don’t dismiss them entirely. They’re a handy tool for comparing different trades.

    Here’s to our health, wealth and a great retirement,

    — Dr. David Eifrig

    This article originally ran on Wednesday, Aug. 14, at

    Dr. David Eifrig Jr. is the editor of two of Stansberry's best advisory services. One of his advisories, Retirement Millionaire, is a monthly letter showing readers how to live a millionaire lifestyle on less than you'd imagine possible. He travels around the U.S. looking for bargains, deals and great investment ideas. Already his average reader has saved $2,793 since 2008 (documented in each Retirement Millionaire issue). He also writes Retirement Trader, a bi-monthly advisory that explains simple techniques to make large, but very safe, gains in the stock and bond markets. This is a pure finance play and the reason Porter Stansberry loves having "Doc" on the team. Doc holds an MBA from Kellogg and has worked in arbitrage and trading groups with major Wall Street investment banks (Goldman Sachs). In 1995, he retired from the "Street," went to UNC-Chapel Hill for medical school and became an ophthalmologist. Now, in his latest "retirement," he joined Stansberry & Associates full-time to share with readers his experiences and ideas.

    | All posts from Dr. David Eifrig Jr.

    Discuss this Story:

    Comment Policy: We encourage open discussion. Comments including racist statements, profanity, name calling or spam will be removed at our discretion. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear it is likely because it violates the policy.

    Oil Trades Near Three-month Low As Excess Supply Takes Toll
    Number Of $5 Billion-plus Takeover Deals Hits Record
    Investor Gabelli Joins Millennials Cutting The Cable Cord
    Gap Cuts Full-year Profit Forecast As Dollar Weighs
    This Is How GOLD Acted During Past Rising Rate Cycles
    Tumbling Treasury Yields Signal Possible Fed ‘Policy Error’ Being Priced In
    WTI Tumbles Back Below $40, Goldman Warns Risk Of “Sharp Leg Lower”
    Former Subway Pitchman Jared Fogle Is About To Be Sentenced
    This Is The Biggest Diamond Found In More Than A Century
    What ISIS ‘Blood Oil’ Really Means For Oil Markets
    The Day Before Thanksgiving Actually Isn’t The Busiest Time To Fly
    Gender Equality Is Now Better In Rwanda Than In The US
    Anonymous Could Hobble ISIS By Hacking PlayStation Consoles
    The Best Advice If You Find Yourself In A Terror Attack: Do Not Play Dead
    Not Much Evidence Mass Surveillance Works
    Home Depot & Lowes Avoid The Retail Bloodbath With Strong Earnings
    It’s REIT Time: Stock Up Durable Dividends Now
    A Global Financial Literacy Test Finds That Just 57% Of Adults In U.S. Are Financially Literate
    Starboard Asks Yahoo To Drop Alibaba Stake Spinoff Plans
    Oil Slides Again As Focus Returns To Heavy Glut
    Best Buy Comparable Sales Miss On Low Demand For Mobile Devices
    Stock Futures Rise After Fed Minutes Soothe Investor Nerves
    U.S. Consumers Favor Amazon For Online Holiday Shopping
    Pfizer-Allergan Talks Accelerate Amid New Inversion Clamp-down
    Soothing Fed Sounds Send Shares, Emerging Markets Higher
    Crude Tumbles To $40 Handle After DOE Confirms Significant Cushing Inventory Build
    U.S. May Bring Criminal Charges Against JP Morgan, RBS Executives, Prosecutors Pretend
    BlackRock Liquidates Its Macro Hedge Fund Following Worst Loss Since Inception, Surge In Redemptions
    It Will SUNE Be Over: Axiom Says SunEdison “Credit Event Appears More Likely”, Sees Price Dropping To $2/Share
    Read more from Investing...

    Liberty Investor Digest

    Get today's most important
    financial headlines all in
    one place by email!



    Sign Up For Liberty Investor Digest™!

    Get Liberty Investor Digest FREE By Email!

    Input your name and email address in the fields below and get today's most important financial headlines sent straight to you inbox!

    Privacy PolicyYou can opt-out at any time. We protect your information like a mother hen. We will not sell or rent your email address to anyone for any reason.