Economy & Politics Investing Liberty Investor Alert Observation & Opinion


  • Economy & Politics
  • Investing
  • Personal Finance
  • Related Posts

    The Rich Man And Lazarus’s Big Gulp
    The U.S. Government: Paying To Undermine Internet Security, Not To Fix It
    Obamacare Data Manipulated By White House-Directed Change In Census Survey
    Parsing The Obamacare Debate
    Why Is Public Television Against Public Schools?
    ‘Kissing Congressman’ McAllister Ducks Tea Party Rally For Counseling
    The Common Core Problem
    The Next US Sanctions May Target Russia’s Own Darth Vader
    Californians Realize They Pay The Government Too Much In Taxes
    Millennials Are Growing Up (Sniff)
    Nudging Taxpayers To Do The Right Thing
    Ukraine Crisis Could Hit Russian GDP
    Rural Population Continues To Decline In The U.S.
    3 Dead After Shootings At Jewish Centers In Kansas
    It Is Precious To Them

    Where Liberty And Safety Meet: The Challenge Of Technology

    Let’s start with Ben Franklin’s assertion, “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.”

    And now fast-forward to the Boston Marathon bombing.

    The political finger-pointing has begun, which usually follows a successful law enforcement effort to actually apprehend the criminals. I suppose it’s a necessary, if not a good, thing that the threat is gone; but the paranoia, politicizing and demagoguery begin.

    I have seen various television shows recently where “freedom-loving American” pundits have proposed abrogating our  1st, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th and 14th Amendments in the name of justice.

    It’s now that the Libertarians are separated from the herd, however. Because Franklin’s quote really means that we have allowed random acts of terror to spawn or relinquish our personal liberties that are guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution.

    This is the debate that has to occur. It’s a continuing debate citizens should have about their government, especially a government that is built on the principle of liberty.

    The other challenging aspect of this tragedy, even for the staunchest libertarian, is the positive role technology played in capturing these individuals. Crowd-sourced photos and video, closed-circuit security cameras all public transportation cameras all came together and were handled and evaluated exceedingly well by law enforcement.

    No one panicked. The various agencies worked well together and executed a very methodical plan.

    Tech Is A Tool

    When the noose closed around the Tsarnaev brothers, we had some friends in town, one of whom works as director of cybersecurity for a large Federal agency.

    We’re always discussing what’s happening in cybersecurity and information security (infosec), the latter being a growing challenge because a lot of people are looking for data and analysis, not just stealing names or stuffing viruses on machines.

    For example, China hosted U.S. representatives to negotiate the terms of a treaty on some specific trade issue. When the meetings were going on, there were few hacking attempts. (There are always some attempts being made.) But after the meetings, the attempts rose logarithmically. The Chinese were trying to find out what the U.S. representatives were discussing among themselves about the agreement.

    No doubt, the United States was doing the same thing to the Chinese delegation.

    Anyway, as my friend and I watched the culmination of the manhunt unfold in front of us, I observed that even with all the technology at their disposal it took humans to interpret it, develop a plan and execute the plan.

    It took the citizens of Boston to lock themselves down to help the manhunt. It took law enforcement to work quickly, carefully and respectfully with the citizens and among themselves.

    Technology was a tool. It didn’t solve the case, but it helped identify the suspects and apprehend them.

    The Challenge

    This will be the debate that will resonate: Can we use the technology without abusing it?

    Was this incident an example of the value of citywide security cameras? Or was it a testament to the resourcefulness of the human condition that it was solved by using a jigsaw puzzle of various resources to paint a clear picture?

    In the United States, this is a significant debate because few places on Earth have a Constitution that is so focused on individuals’ rights as citizens. In most other industrialized nations, the state can do as it sees fit (within reason, for the most part).

    While I’m no fan of Big Brother, I also know that technologies can be very useful when in the right hands. And whether it’s government bureaucrats or underpaid, overworked private-sector employees, I’m a bit skittish trusting either with my liberty.

    That said, some of this surveillance technology is coming whether we like it or not. For example, for many years the military had an acronym C3ISR. It stood for Command, Control, Communications, Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance.

    About 10 years ago, it became C4ISR when Computing was added. And now, it’s C5ISR as Combat Systems has been added.

    This represents technologies entering the battle space. And this is one sector where cameras and surveillance are crucial to keeping people alive.

    Now, of course, some of this involves mission creep at the end of the day.

    One company I have always liked in this space on military side is FLIR Systems, Inc. (FLIR). The company makes forward-looking infrared cameras. These spot heat signatures in any kind of weather at great distance.

    Reportedly, the police were using a FLIR camera to find Suspect No. 2 in the boat. But these cameras have proved themselves on drones and helicopters as well as stationary intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR) in forward positions in Iraq and Afghanistan. And now at home first responders are beginning to use them. The cameras are also very popular for maritime operations where fog, waves and rain can make navigation very challenging.

    Another company to watch in this space for different reasons is Cobham plc (LSE:COB). This company is the chief contractor to the British government for security camera operations around the country.

    Unlike in the United States, the United Kingdom has chosen to allow the government to install cameras around the country. Cobham, which is one of the chief contractors, has developed some very advanced visual recognition software and is an internationally respected expert on these systems. That includes monitoring, accessing and searching massive video databases, which will likely have more added benefits as computer users watch more and video and, thus, search for more video.

    So what to do you think? Is there a happy medium between liberty and safety? If not, should we opt for liberty or safety? Can we trust anyone to control this kind of technology?

    — GS Early

    Discuss this Story:

    Comment Policy: We encourage open discussion. Comments including racist statements, profanity, name calling or spam will be removed at our discretion. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear it is likely because it violates the policy.

    Ranchers Claim Victory As Bureau Of Land Management Pulls Out Of Bundy Operation
    The Shale Boom And Its Impact On Domestic Energy Supply
    Will The National Republican Senatorial Committee Pledge To Support Chris McDaniel?
    John McCain And Lindsey Graham Oppose Ben Sasse In Nebraska
    East Ukraine Braces For Military Operation As Ultimatum Passes
    Did CIA Director Brennan Visit Kiev Recently?
    UN Security Council Begins Discussion Of Situation In Ukraine
    Obama On The Red Line And On The Rat Line
    “The Next America” – Two Dramas In Slow Motion
    31-Year-Old Hedge Fund Trader Made More Than The CEOs Of The Six Biggest Banks Combined
    World Trade Picture Improves But 2014 Still Below Trend: WTO
    Private Money, Public Projects: More U.S. States Doing Deals
    Housing Industry Asks $5 Trillion Question: What Does Watt Want?
    Rocky Mountain High Or Reefer Madness? Legal Pot In Colorado Comes With Risks
    NSA Knew Of Heartbleed Virus Report Says
    Every Central Bank For Itself
    Why China Gets A Miserable Return On Its $5.9 Trillion In Foreign Assets
    China’s Princelings Are Taking Over Its Private Equity Industry
    Judicial Interpretation
    Nevada Ranch Dispute Highlights Conflicting Sovereignties: Federal, State And Individual
    Another Conservative Rebellion Brewing In The House
    The Paul Craig Roberts Dilemma: World War Or The End Of The Dollar
    Why Meat Prices Are Going To Continue Soaring For The Foreseeable Future
    David Stockman: The Born Again Jobs Scam, Part 2: The Fed’s Labor Market Delusion
    It’s On: Gazprom Prepares ‘Symbolic’ Bond Issue In Chinese Yuan
    The US Consumer Is So Strong, Family Dollar Is Closing 370 Stores
    Democratic Senate Prospects And The New Black Voter
    Jindal Calls On McAllister To Resign
    Kathleen Sebelius Resigns
    White House Admits Democrats Will Lose The Senate
    Read more from Economy & Politics...

    Liberty Investor Digest

    Get today's most important
    financial headlines all in
    one place by email!



    Sign Up For Liberty Investor Digest™!

    Get Liberty Investor Digest FREE By Email!

    Input your name and email address in the fields below and get today's most important financial headlines sent straight to you inbox!

    Privacy PolicyYou can opt-out at any time. We protect your information like a mother hen. We will not sell or rent your email address to anyone for any reason.